Literature DB >> 2795264

Research consent forms: continued unreadability and increasing length.

M E LoVerde1, A V Prochazka, R L Byyny.   

Abstract

Consent forms are often long and incomprehensible. The authors studied 88 consecutive research consent forms generated at the Denver Veterans Administration Medical Center, evaluating the reading levels of the forms using the Fry Readability Scale and recording the numbers of lines of text. The mean grade reading level required for comprehension was 13.4 years of schooling. Twenty-two percent of all text passages scored were at the postgraduate level of readability. This difficult readability level has not improved since the forms were last tested in 1982. The mean length of the forms was 84.6 lines. Also found was a 58% increase in the length of forms since 1982, a factor known to impair comprehension. These factors, poor readability and increasing length, may make many consent forms incomprehensible. It is recommended that investigators be brief, use plain English, and write consent forms at appropriate reading levels, and receive training on how to obtain valid consent.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2795264     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  9 in total

Review 1.  Comprehension of informed consent for research: issues and directions for future study.

Authors:  Harvey A Taub
Journal:  IRB       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec

2.  Obtaining informed consent. Form or substance.

Authors:  L C Epstein; L Lasagna
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1969-06

3.  Readability of informed consent forms for research in a Veterans Administration medical center.

Authors:  M T Baker; H A Taub
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Some observations on informed consent in non-therapeutic research.

Authors:  J C Garnham
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Competency to decide about treatment or research: an overview of some empirical data.

Authors:  L H Roth; C W Lidz; A Meisel; P H Soloff; K Kaufman; D G Spiker; F G Foster
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  1982

6.  Informed consent -- why are its goals imperfectly realized?

Authors:  B R Cassileth; R V Zupkis; K Sutton-Smith; V March
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The elderly and informed consent: effects of vocabulary level and corrected feedback.

Authors:  H A Taub; G E Kline; M T Baker
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.645

8.  Informed consent to biomedical research in Veterans Administration Hospitals.

Authors:  H W Riecken; R Ravich
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-07-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  On the readability of surgical consent forms.

Authors:  T M Grundner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

  9 in total
  17 in total

1.  Length and complexity of US and international HIV consent forms from federal HIV network trials.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Lelia Chaisson; Holly A Taylor; Jennifer Lohse
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Increasing burden of institutional review in multicenter clinical trials of infertility: the Reproductive Medicine Network experience with the Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PPCOS) I and II studies.

Authors:  William D Schlaff; Heping Zhang; Michael P Diamond; Christos Coutifaris; Peter R Casson; Robert G Brzyski; Gregory M Christman; Kurt T Barnhart; J C Trussell; Stephen A Krawetz; Peter J Snyder; Dana Ohl; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Hao Huang; Richard S Legro
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Evidence-Based Strategies for Shortening Informed Consent Forms in Clinical Research.

Authors:  Amy Corneli; Emily Namey; Monique P Mueller; Jenae Tharaldson; Steve Sortijas; Thomas Grey; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Views of Cohort Study Participants about Returning Research Results in the Context of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Travis Hyams; Deborah J Bowen; Celeste Condit; Jeremy Grossman; Megan Fitzmaurice; Deborah Goodman; Lari Wenzel; Karen L Edwards
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Facilitating Informed Permission/Assent/Consent in Pediatric Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Susan M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 6.  The doctor's duty to the elderly patient in clinical trials.

Authors:  Antony Bayer; Mark Fish
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Consent timing and experience: modifiable factors that may influence interest in clinical research.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Drew W Rasco; Celette Sugg Skinner; Jonathan E Dowell; Jingsheng Yan; Jennifer R Sayne; Yang Xie
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Reformed consent: adapting to new media and research participant preferences.

Authors:  James Henry; Barton W Palmer; Lawrence Palinkas; Danielle Kukene Glorioso; Michael P Caligiuri; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

9.  Association of Health Literacy With Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Jesse P Wright; Gretchen C Edwards; Kathryn Goggins; Vikram Tiwari; Amelia Maiga; Kelvin Moses; Sunil Kripalani; Kamran Idrees
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Simplifying informed consent for biorepositories: stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Joëlle Y Friedman; N Chantelle Hardy; Li Lin; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.