Literature DB >> 6630431

Evaluation of the BACTEC antimicrobial removal system for detection of bacteremia.

N M McGuire, C A Kauffman, C S Hertz, J M Kovach.   

Abstract

The BACTEC 16B resin medium was developed to detect bacteremia in patients receiving antimicrobial therapy. Over a 9-month period, we compared the efficacy of the BACTEC 16B bottle to the conventional aerobic BACTEC 6B bottle. Of a total of 1,524 sets of blood cultures, 79 yielded presumed pathogens. Of these 79 sets, 42 (53.2%) were positive in both the 16B and 6B bottles, 23 (29.1%) were positive only in the 16B bottle, and 14 (17.7%) were positive only in the 6B bottle. For patients receiving antimicrobial drugs, 33 of 34 (97.1%) sets were positive for pathogens in the 16B bottle, but only 15 of 34 (44.1%) were positive in the 6B bottle. In 19 (55.9%) of the 34 sets, only the 16B bottle yielded growth. The resin bottle was more useful for patients with gram-positive bacteremia than for those with gram-negative bacteremia. The BACTEC 16B resin medium increases the recovery of organisms from bacteremic patients receiving antimicrobial agents and should be used in addition to the standard BACTEC aerobic bottle for such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6630431      PMCID: PMC270831          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.449-451.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  Mima polymorpha bacteremia. False-positive cultures due to contaminated penicillinase.

Authors:  H M Faris; F F Sparling
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Pseudosepticemia.

Authors:  C W Norden
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Effect of various anticoagulants and no anticoagulant on ability to isolate bacteria directly from parallel clinical blood specimens.

Authors:  R Rosner
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 4.  The laboratory approach to the detection of bacteremia.

Authors:  R C Tilton
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 15.500

5.  Rapid isolation of bacteria from septicemic patients by use of an antimicrobial agent removal device.

Authors:  C Wallis; J L Melnick; R D Wende; P E Riely
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The antimicrobial removal device. A microbiological and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  A J Wright; R L Thompson; C A McLimans; W R Wilson; J A Washington
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Evaluation of the Antibiotic Removal Device.

Authors:  M D Appleman; R S Swinney; P N Heseltine
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  In vitro antibiotic removal and bacterial recovery from blood with an antibiotic removal device.

Authors:  N J Lindsey; P E Riely
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Enhanced detection of bacteremia with a new BACTEC resin blood culture medium.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; D G Beckwith; J R Dipersio; J W Dyke; J F Salventi; L L Stone
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Advantage of combining resin with lytic BACTEC blood culture media.

Authors:  P Rohner; B Pepey; R Auckenthaler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; S Mirrett; M L Wilson; L J Harrell; C W Stratton; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Routine evaluation of BACTEC NR-16A and NR-17A media.

Authors:  R J Courcol; A V Durocher; M Roussel-Delvallez; A Fruchart; G R Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Current controversies in the detection of septicemia.

Authors:  G Pierce; P R Murray
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Evaluation of new blood culture processing systems.

Authors:  J A Moody; C E Fasching; C J Shanholtzer; D N Gerding; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of BACTEC PLUS blood culture media to BacT/Alert FA blood culture media for detection of bacterial pathogens in samples containing therapeutic levels of antibiotics.

Authors:  Diane Flayhart; Anita P Borek; Teresa Wakefield; James Dick; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Performance of two resin-containing blood culture media in detection of bloodstream infections and in direct matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) broth assays for isolate identification: clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert Plus and Bactec Plus systems.

Authors:  Barbara Fiori; Tiziana D'Inzeo; Viviana Di Florio; Flavio De Maio; Giulia De Angelis; Alessia Giaquinto; Lara Campana; Eloisa Tanzarella; Mario Tumbarello; Massimo Antonelli; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Teresa Spanu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Controlled clinical evaluation of BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F and BacT/Alert Aerobic FAN bottles for detection of bloodstream infections.

Authors:  J K Pohlman; B A Kirkley; K A Easley; B A Basille; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.