Literature DB >> 6628146

Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium-enema examination in the identification of adenomas and carcinoma of the colon.

P A Farrands, K D Vellacott, S S Amar, T W Balfour, J D Hardcastle.   

Abstract

To assess the accuracy of the flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscope, 227 consecutive patients (mean age 61.8 +/- 13 years) requiring investigation of colonic symptoms were evaluated using rigid and flexible sigmoidoscopy (PAF and KDV) and double-contrast barium enema (SSA). Patients with equivocal findings or adenomatous polyps underwent colonoscopy (TWB). Thirty-four patients had carcinoma and 50 patients had one or more adenomatous polyps (greater than 5mm). The neoplastic yield from rigid sigmoidoscopy was 12 per cent, flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy 90 per cent, and double-contrast barium enema only 76 per cent. Barium enema failed to identify eight carcinomas and 13 adenomatous polyps; seven of the eight carcinomas were polypoid Dukes' Stage A lesions, and associated diverticular disease was present in 62.5 per cent of cases. Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy failed to identify seven carcinomas and one adenomatous polyp. Five of the carcinomas were beyond range of the instrument; in one patient, a stricture was seen that was caused by the carcinoma; and in the seventh patient, the examination was terminated because of angulation spasm. Double-contrast barium enema is inaccurate in detecting lesions in the sigmoid colon, with flexible sigmoidoscopy being superior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6628146     DOI: 10.1007/bf02554983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  13 in total

1.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy in a family practice.

Authors:  M Flotre
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Future requirements for colonoscopy in Britain. Report by the Endoscopy Section Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Open access fibresigmoidoscopy: a comparative audit of efficacy.

Authors:  L Kalra; W R Price; B J Jones; A N Hamlyn
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-04-16

4.  A comparison of the localization of rectal carcinomas according to the general rules of the Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma (JCCRC) and Western guidelines.

Authors:  Akira Tanaka; Sotaro Sadahiro; Toshiyuki Suzuki; Kazutake Okada; Gota Saito
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Early diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; N C Armitage
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Problems in the colonoscopic localization of tumors: continued value of the barium enema.

Authors:  D H Frager; J D Frager; E L Wolf; T C Beneventano
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1987

7.  Perception errors with double-contrast enema after a positive guaiac test.

Authors:  J Kewenter; J Jensen; M Boijsen; G Lycke; U Tylén
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1987

8.  Audit on the use of the barium enema.

Authors:  K D Vellacott; J Virjee
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Diagnostic yield from barium enemas: a study among patients referred by general practitioners and hospital outpatient departments.

Authors:  J M Wafula
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Comparative evaluation of investigations for colorectal carcinoma in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  L Kalra; A N Hamlyn
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.