Literature DB >> 3792765

Perception errors with double-contrast enema after a positive guaiac test.

J Kewenter, J Jensen, M Boijsen, G Lycke, U Tylén.   

Abstract

Between 3 and 6 of 12 colorectal neoplasms larger than 1 cm in diameter were overlooked by each of 4 radiologists in 117 individuals investigated with double-contrast enema (DCE) after a positive guaiac test. Even when the individual results of 2, 3, or 4 experienced radiologists were combined, 2 small carcinomas were overlooked due to perception errors. One of these carcinomas was diagnosed by rectosigmoidoscopy, which is an important and necessary complement to DCE. Although small carcinomas may be missed even with this combination, meticulous exploitation of the 2 methods is absolutely necessary to minimize the risk of missing a colorectal neoplasm. A drawback when 2 or more radiologists read the radiographs is the increased number of false-positive findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3792765     DOI: 10.1007/BF01885109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of barium enema nad colonoscopy in the detection of small colonic polyps.

Authors:  R F Thoeni; L Menuck
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Colonoscopy in the management of colon polyps.

Authors:  C B Williams; R H Hunt; H Loose; R H Riddell; Y Sakai; E T Swarbrick
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  President's address. The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel.

Authors:  B Morson
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1974-06

4.  Early detection of colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood tests.

Authors:  M S Elliot; J H Levenstein; J P Wright; R E Kottler
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1984-08-11

5.  Single- vs. double-contrast gastrointestinal studies: critical analysis of reported statistics.

Authors:  D W Gelfand; D J Ott
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  The value of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium-enema examinations in the evaluation of patients with subacute and chronic lower intestinal bleeding.

Authors:  R F Thoeni; A C Venbrux
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  [The significance of x-ray-examination in early diagnosis of colon carcinoma compared with colonoscopy (author's transl)].

Authors:  H F Fuchs; U Stadler; J Reichert
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology. II. Barium enema examination.

Authors:  D J Ott; D W Gelfand; N A Ramquist
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1980-04-30

9.  Colorectal carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perception.

Authors:  F M Kelvin; R Gardiner; W Vas; G W Stevenson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  I. Observations on the adenoma as precursor to ordinary large bowel carcinoma.

Authors:  N Lane; C M Fenoglio
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1976
View more
  2 in total

1.  Colonoscopically detected colorectal cancer missed on barium enema.

Authors:  N Anderson; H B Cook; R Coates
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

Review 2.  Primary tumour staging of gastric and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J N Bruneton; E Francois; B Padovani; C Raffaelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.