Literature DB >> 1457154

Diagnostic yield from barium enemas: a study among patients referred by general practitioners and hospital outpatient departments.

J M Wafula1.   

Abstract

Although the double contrast barium enema is the standard radiological examination of the colon, it is not universally available to patients referred by their general practitioners. A retrospective survey of all double contrast barium enemas carried out over a two year period in one health district was undertaken to determine the diagnostic yield of pathological findings for patients referred by general practitioners and hospital outpatient departments and for patients who had rigid sigmoidoscopy prior to the enema and those who did not. A total of 530 patients were studied. The diagnostic yield for the hospital outpatients was 41.6% and in the general practitioner group 35.6%. In the patients who had rigid sigmoidoscopy the yield was 42.7% compared with 32.6% in those who had no prior sigmoidoscopy. It is concluded that the withdrawal of direct access for barium enemas to general practitioner patients in this district because of a low diagnostic yield cannot be justified. The lower diagnostic yield in the patients who did not have sigmoidoscopy supports the policy of requiring this examination prior to all barium enemas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1457154      PMCID: PMC1372175     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  7 in total

1.  Open access fibresigmoidoscopy: a comparative audit of efficacy.

Authors:  L Kalra; W R Price; B J Jones; A N Hamlyn
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-04-16

2.  Routine colonic lavage is unnecessary for double-contrast barium enema in outpatients.

Authors:  G De Lacey; M Benson; R Wilkins; J Spencer; B Cramer
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-04-03

3.  A new oral bowel evacuant (Picolax) for colon cleansing.

Authors:  K Hughes; S Mann; M B Cooke; W B James
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Fiberoptic pansigmoidoscopy. An evaluation and comparison with rigid sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  T W Bohlman; R M Katon; G R Lipshutz; M F McCool; F W Smith; C S Melnyk
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium-enema examination in the identification of adenomas and carcinoma of the colon.

Authors:  P A Farrands; K D Vellacott; S S Amar; T W Balfour; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Audit on the use of the barium enema.

Authors:  K D Vellacott; J Virjee
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Comparison of rigid and flexible fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy with double contrast barium enemas.

Authors:  K D Vellacott; S S Amar; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 6.939

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.