Literature DB >> 6609222

A parametric study of the stimulation variables affecting the magnitude of the olfactory nerve response.

M M Mozell, P R Sheehe, S W Swieck, D B Kurtz, D E Hornung.   

Abstract

The magnitude of olfactory responses can be related to three primary variables [number of odorant molecules (N), sniff volume (V), and sniff duration (T)] and three derived variables [concentration (C = N/V), flow rate (F = V/T), and delivery rate (D = N/T)]. To evaluate the effects of these interdependent variables upon the olfactory response, the summated multiunit discharges were recorded from the olfactory nerves of nine frogs in response to octane presented at two levels (in 2:1 ratio) of each primary variable. This presentation defined eight "sniff" combinations representing three levels of each derived variable. In an ANOVA of the logs of the responses, the effect of each primary variable was highly significant, with no significant interactions. A multiplicative regression model incorporating the effects of the three primary variables represented responses exceedingly well, with positive effects of N and T and a negative effect of V. When, with this model, the effect of each of the derived variables was isolated from the effects of all other variables, the analysis showed a positive effect for C, a near-zero positive effect for D, and a negative effect for F. Placing certain constraints upon the model parameters generates 13 distinct one- and two-variable models (e.g., the [C, T] model requires N and V to have equal but opposite effects). In ranking these reduced models in terms of their ability to predict the neural response, the predictive ability of [F, N] and [C, T] was at least as good as that of the three-variable model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6609222      PMCID: PMC2215629          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.83.2.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  13 in total

1.  Subjective scales of intensity for the three odors.

Authors:  F N JONES
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1958-06

2.  Properties of chemoreceptors of tongue of rat.

Authors:  L M BEIDLER
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1953-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Olfactory mucosal and neural responses in the frog.

Authors:  M M MOZELL
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1962-08

4.  Odorant removal from the frog olfactory mucosa.

Authors:  D E Hornung; M M Mozell
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-06-03       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Invariance of odor strength with sniff vigor: an olfactory analogue to size constancy.

Authors:  R Teghtsoonian; M Teghtsoonian; B Berglund; U Berglund
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Relation of odor flow rate and duration to stimulus intensity needed for perception.

Authors:  R A Schneider; C E Schmidt; J P Costiloe
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Perceived odor intensity as a function of air flow through the nose.

Authors:  T Rehn
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1978-09

8.  Physical variables in the olfactory stimulation process.

Authors:  D TUCKER
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  The spatiotemporal analysis of odorants at the level of the olfactory receptor sheet.

Authors:  M M Mozell
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Evidence for a chromatographic model of olfaction.

Authors:  M M Mozell
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  8 in total

1.  An impairment in sniffing contributes to the olfactory impairment in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  N Sobel; M E Thomason; I Stappen; C M Tanner; J W Tetrud; J M Bower; E V Sullivan; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A method for the rapid automated assessment of olfactory function.

Authors:  Steven L Youngentob
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  How much does nasal cavity morphology matter? Patterns and rates of olfactory airflow in phyllostomid bats.

Authors:  Thomas P Eiting; J Blair Perot; Elizabeth R Dumont
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Conductive olfactory losses in chronic rhinosinusitis? A computational fluid dynamics study of 29 patients.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Jianbo Jiang; Edmund A Pribitkin; Pamela Dalton; David Rosen; Brian Lyman; Karen K Yee; Nancy E Rawson; Beverly J Cowart
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.858

Review 5.  Bacterial chemotaxis and vertebrate olfaction.

Authors:  S J Kleene
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1986-03-15

6.  Retronasal odor representations in the dorsal olfactory bulb of rats.

Authors:  Shree Hari Gautam; Justus V Verhagen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Experience-induced fetal plasticity: the effect of gestational ethanol exposure on the behavioral and neurophysiologic olfactory response to ethanol odor in early postnatal and adult rats.

Authors:  Steven L Youngentob; Paul F Kent; Paul R Sheehe; Juan C Molina; Norman E Spear; Lisa M Youngentob
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  The consequence of fetal ethanol exposure and adolescent odor re-exposure on the response to ethanol odor in adolescent and adult rats.

Authors:  Amber M Eade; Paul R Sheehe; Juan C Molina; Norman E Spear; Lisa M Youngentob; Steven L Youngentob
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.759

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.