Literature DB >> 25520358

How much does nasal cavity morphology matter? Patterns and rates of olfactory airflow in phyllostomid bats.

Thomas P Eiting1, J Blair Perot2, Elizabeth R Dumont3.   

Abstract

The morphology of the nasal cavity in mammals with a good sense of smell includes features that are thought to improve olfactory airflow, such as a dorsal conduit that delivers odours quickly to the olfactory mucosa, an enlarged olfactory recess at the back of the airway, and a clear separation of the olfactory and respiratory regions of the nose. The link between these features and having a good sense of smell has been established by functional examinations of a handful of distantly related mammalian species. In this paper, we provide the first detailed examination of olfactory airflow in a group of closely related species that nevertheless vary in their sense of smell. We study six species of phyllostomid bats that have different airway morphologies and foraging ecologies, which have been linked to differences in olfactory ability or reliance. We hypothesize that differences in morphology correlate with differences in the patterns and rates of airflow, which in turn are consistent with dietary differences. To compare species, we make qualitative and quantitative comparisons of the patterns and rates of airflow through the olfactory region during both inhalation and exhalation across the six species. Contrary to our expectations, we find no clear differences among species in either the patterns of airflow through the airway or in rates of flow through the olfactory region. By and large, olfactory airflow seems to be conserved across species, suggesting that morphological differences appear to be driven by other mechanical demands on the snout, such as breathing and feeding. Olfactory ability may depend on other aspects of the system, such as the neurobiological processing of odours that work within the existing morphology imposed by other functional demands on the nasal cavity.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational fluid dynamics; ethmoturbinate; olfaction; phyllostomid bats

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25520358      PMCID: PMC4298208          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  30 in total

1.  Airflow and nanoparticle deposition in rat nose under various breathing and sniffing conditions: a computational evaluation of the unsteady effect.

Authors:  Jianbo Jiang; Kai Zhao
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.433

2.  Connecting behaviour and performance: the evolution of biting behaviour and bite performance in bats.

Authors:  S E Santana; E R Dumont
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  A re-estimation of the number of glomeruli and mitral cells in the olfactory bulb of rabbit.

Authors:  J P Royet; H Distel; R Hudson; R Gervais
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-03-30       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Many-to-One Mapping of Form to Function: A General Principle in Organismal Design?

Authors:  Peter C Wainwright; Michael E Alfaro; Daniel I Bolnick; C Darrin Hulsey
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.326

5.  A numerical model of nasal odorant transport for the analysis of human olfaction.

Authors:  K Keyhani; P W Scherer; M M Mozell
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1997-06-07       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Olfactory epithelium in the olfactory recess: a case study in new world leaf-nosed bats.

Authors:  Thomas P Eiting; Timothy D Smith; Elizabeth R Dumont
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  The role of the olfactory recess in olfactory airflow.

Authors:  Thomas P Eiting; Timothy D Smith; J Blair Perot; Elizabeth R Dumont
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Reconstruction and morphometric analysis of the nasal airway of the dog (Canis familiaris) and implications regarding olfactory airflow.

Authors:  Brent A Craven; Thomas Neuberger; Eric G Paterson; Andrew G Webb; Eleanor M Josephson; Edward E Morrison; Gary S Settles
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  A parametric study of the stimulation variables affecting the magnitude of the olfactory nerve response.

Authors:  M M Mozell; P R Sheehe; S W Swieck; D B Kurtz; D E Hornung
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  The spatiotemporal analysis of odorants at the level of the olfactory receptor sheet.

Authors:  M M Mozell
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Role of ortho-retronasal olfaction in mammalian cortical evolution.

Authors:  Timothy B Rowe; Gordon M Shepherd
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Role of nasal vestibule morphological variations on olfactory airflow dynamics.

Authors:  Ryan M Sicard; Dennis O Frank-Ito
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Role of ecology in shaping external nasal morphology in bats and implications for olfactory tracking.

Authors:  Alyson F Brokaw; Michael Smotherman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Olfactory tracking strategies in a neotropical fruit bat.

Authors:  Alyson F Brokaw; Michael Smotherman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Vomeronasal and Olfactory Structures in Bats Revealed by DiceCT Clarify Genetic Evidence of Function.

Authors:  Laurel R Yohe; Simone Hoffmann; Abigail Curtis
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.856

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.