Literature DB >> 13994681

Physical variables in the olfactory stimulation process.

D TUCKER.   

Abstract

Electrical recording from small twigs of nerve in a tortoise showed that olfactory, vomeronasal, and trigeminal receptors in the nose are responsive to various odorants. No one kind of receptor was most sensitive to all odorants. For controlled stimulation, odorant was caused to appear in a stream of gas already flowing through the nose. Of the parameters definable at the naris, temperature, relative humidity, and nature of inert gas had little effect on olfactory responses to amyl acetate, whereas odorant species, odorant concentration, and volume flow rate effectively determined the responses of all nasal chemoreceptors. An intrinsic variable of accessibility to the receptors, particularly olfactory, was demonstrated. Flow dependence of chemoreceptor responses is thought to reflect the necessity for delivery of odorant molecules to receptor sites. Since the olfactory receptors are relatively exposed, plateauing of the response with flow rate for slightly soluble odorants suggests an approach to concentration equilibrium in the overlying mucus with that in the air entering the naris. Accordingly, data for responses to amyl acetate were fitted with Beidler's (1954) taste equation for two kinds of sites being active. The requirement for finite aqueous solubility, if true, suggests substitution of aqueous solutions for gaseous solutions. A suitable medium was found and results conformed to expectations. Olfactory receptors were insensitive to variation of ionic strength, pH, and osmotic pressure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OLFACTORY NERVE; RECEPTORS, NEURAL; SMELL

Mesh:

Year:  1963        PMID: 13994681      PMCID: PMC2195282          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.46.3.453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  11 in total

1.  The electrical activity of the olfactory epithelium studied with micro- and macro-electrodes.

Authors:  S F TAKAGI; T SHIBUYA
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  1960-08-15

2.  Some evidence for a mechanical receptor in olfactory function.

Authors:  S UEKI; E F DOMINO
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Bacterial permeases.

Authors:  G N COHEN; J MONOD
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1957-09

4.  The function of the paranasal sinuses.

Authors:  V NEGUS
Journal:  AMA Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1957-10

5.  Analysis of the electrical activity of the olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  D OTTOSON
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1955

6.  Sustained potentials evoked by olfactory stimulation.

Authors:  D OTTOSON
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1954-12-31

7.  Olfactory reactions in the brain of the hedgehog.

Authors:  E D Adrian
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1942-03-31       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Quantitative observations on the olfactory system of the rabbit.

Authors:  A C ALLISON; R T T WARWICK
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1949-06       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  The electrical activity of the mammalian olfactory bulb.

Authors:  E D ADRIAN
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1950-11

10.  Olfactory nerve fibers.

Authors:  H S GASSER
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1956-03-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  27 in total

1.  An impairment in sniffing contributes to the olfactory impairment in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  N Sobel; M E Thomason; I Stappen; C M Tanner; J W Tetrud; J M Bower; E V Sullivan; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Olfactory-hypoglossal connections.

Authors:  Ombretta Mameli; Antonella Russo; Rosemary Borke; Francesco Melis; Marcello Alessandro Caria; Rosaria Pellitteri; Claudio Tavera; Stefania Stanzani
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 3.  Chemosensory properties of the trigeminal system.

Authors:  Félix Viana
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.418

4.  Time course of the membrane current underlying sensory transduction in salamander olfactory receptor neurones.

Authors:  S Firestein; G M Shepherd; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Odorant response of isolated olfactory receptor cells is blocked by amiloride.

Authors:  S Frings; B Lindemann
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  The effect of concanavalin A on the rat electro-olfactogram at various odorant concentrations.

Authors:  S G Shirley; E H Polak; D A Edwards; M A Wood; G H Dodd
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1987-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  An apparatus for the assessment of the reinforcing properties of odors in small animals.

Authors:  C J Long; J T Tapp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Responses of single cells in the olfactory bulb of rabbits to air flow.

Authors:  M E Westecker
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 9.  Theory and methods for odor evaluation.

Authors:  B Berglund; U Berglund; T Lindvall
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1986-03-15

Review 10.  [Evaluating function and disorders of smell].

Authors:  C Herberhold
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1975
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.