Literature DB >> 5971031

The spatiotemporal analysis of odorants at the level of the olfactory receptor sheet.

M M Mozell.   

Abstract

Activity in two separate regions of the frog olfactory mucosa was sampled by simultaneously recording the summated neural discharges from the olfactory nerve branches originating from them. The difference in the activity from these two regions in response to a stimulus was measured by: (a) the ratio of the response amplitude recorded from the lateral nerve branch to that recorded from the medial nerve branch (LB/MB ratio), (b) the latency difference (or time interval) between these two responses. Equal concentrations of four different odorants were drawn into the nose by an artificially produced sniff of known dimensions. At each concentration in every animal the four chemicals were ranked in order of the magnitudes of their LB/MB ratios and again in order of their latency differences. Regardless of their concentration, the same chemicals fell into the same ranks in different animals. In addition, for each chemical the magnitudes of the ratios and latency differences showed only minimal changes with concentration. Thus, spatiotemporal patterns of relative response magnitudes and latency differences across the mucosa differentially represented the odorants. Such a spatiotemporal code, together with physicochemical considerations, suggested that the nose separates vapors in a manner similar to a gas chromatograph. This is further supported by the previously observed reversal of the ratio patterns with reversal of air flow direction through the olfactory sac.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1966        PMID: 5971031      PMCID: PMC2225636          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.50.1.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  7 in total

1.  EVIDENCE FOR SORPTION AS A MECHANISM OF THE OLFACTORY ANALYSIS OF VAPOURS.

Authors:  M M MOZELL
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1964-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  THE GAS CHROMATOGRAPH WITH HUMAN SENSOR: PERFUMER MODEL.

Authors:  G H FULLER; R STELTENKAMP; G A TISSERAND
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1964-07-30       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL SPATIOTEMPORAL BASIS.

Authors:  M M MOZELL
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-03-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Electrophysiology of olfactory bulb.

Authors:  M M MOZELL
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1958-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Properties of chemoreceptors of tongue of rat.

Authors:  L M BEIDLER
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1953-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The basis of sensation; some recent studies of olfaction.

Authors:  E D ADRIAN
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1954-02-06

7.  Olfactory mucosal and neural responses in the frog.

Authors:  M M MOZELL
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1962-08
  7 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Sniffing and spatiotemporal coding in olfaction.

Authors:  John W Scott
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  How much does nasal cavity morphology matter? Patterns and rates of olfactory airflow in phyllostomid bats.

Authors:  Thomas P Eiting; J Blair Perot; Elizabeth R Dumont
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Conductive olfactory losses in chronic rhinosinusitis? A computational fluid dynamics study of 29 patients.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Jianbo Jiang; Edmund A Pribitkin; Pamela Dalton; David Rosen; Brian Lyman; Karen K Yee; Nancy E Rawson; Beverly J Cowart
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.858

4.  Responses of olfactory bulb neurones to odour stimulation of small nasal areas in the salamander.

Authors:  J S Kauer; D G Moulton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Tests of the sorption and olfactory "fovea" hypotheses in the mouse.

Authors:  David M Coppola; Brittaney E Ritchie; Brent A Craven
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Mimicking biological design and computing principles in artificial olfaction.

Authors:  Baranidharan Raman; Mark Stopfer; Steve Semancik
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.418

7.  Long hydrocarbon chains serve as unique molecular features recognized by ventral glomeruli of the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Sabrina L Ho; Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  A 3D transcriptomics atlas of the mouse nose sheds light on the anatomical logic of smell.

Authors:  Mayra L Ruiz Tejada Segura; Eman Abou Moussa; Elisa Garabello; Thiago S Nakahara; Melanie Makhlouf; Lisa S Mathew; Li Wang; Filippo Valle; Susie S Y Huang; Joel D Mainland; Michele Caselle; Matteo Osella; Stephan Lorenz; Johannes Reisert; Darren W Logan; Bettina Malnic; Antonio Scialdone; Luis R Saraiva
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Molecular dynamics simulations of water/mucus partition coefficients for feeding stimulants in fish and the implications for olfaction.

Authors:  Alex D Rygg; Adri C T van Duin; Brent A Craven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A parametric study of the stimulation variables affecting the magnitude of the olfactory nerve response.

Authors:  M M Mozell; P R Sheehe; S W Swieck; D B Kurtz; D E Hornung
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.