Literature DB >> 6582784

Bends in human mitotic metaphase chromosomes, including a bend marking the X-inactivation center.

W L Flejter, D L Van Dyke, L Weiss.   

Abstract

Bends in mitotic metaphase chromosomes are not distributed randomly throughout the karyotype. The frequency of bends at centromeres is positively correlated with the relative length of the chromosomes and negatively correlated with the centromere index (more bends in metacentrics, fewer in acrocentrics). The frequency of bends in the noncentromeric regions (except at Xq13-Xq21) is positively correlated with the relative length of chromosome arms. A bend at Xq13.3 to Xq21.1 was more frequent than a bend in any other region of the karyotype, centromeric or noncentromeric. It was observed in one member of the X-chromosome pair in 63% of 46,XX cells. In contrast, it was observed in only 2% of 46,XY cells. RBG-staining showed that this specific bend is confined to the lyonized X chromosome. These observations in cells from normal subjects were confirmed using G-banding and RBG-staining on cells from nine subjects with different X-chromosome abnormalities and on metaphases from amniotic fluid cell and lymphocyte cultures. The "center for Barr body condensation" has been localized to the region between Xq11.2 and Xq21.1. The functional and structural relationship is unclear, but we believe this highly specific bend may represent a visible manifestation of the condensation process; it could represent the first folded (and last unfolded) position, upon or around which the rest of the chromosome condenses. The late replication of this region may also be a factor. The smallest region of overlap (SRO) for the X-chromosome inactivation center and the specific chromosome bend is Xq13.3 to Xq21.1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6582784      PMCID: PMC1684396     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  10 in total

Review 1.  X inactivation, differentiation, and DNA methylation.

Authors:  A D Riggs
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1975

2.  Apparently isodicentric but functionally monocentric X chromosome in man.

Authors:  E Therman; G E Sarto; K Patau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Center for Barr body condensation on the proximal part of the human Xq: a hypothesis.

Authors:  E Therman; G E Sarto; K Patau
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1974-01-29       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  Arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus.

Authors:  D E Comings
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Structural anomalies of the X chromosome and inactivation center.

Authors:  M G Mattei; J F Mattei; I Vidal; F Giraud
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  The characterization of high-resolution G-banded chromosomes of man.

Authors:  J J Yunis; J R Sawyer; D W Ball
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1978-08-14       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Reactivation of an inactive human X chromosome: evidence for X inactivation by DNA methylation.

Authors:  T Mohandas; R S Sparkes; L J Shapiro
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The origin of inverted tandem duplications, and phenotypic effects of tandem duplication of the X chromosome long arm.

Authors:  D L Van Dyke; M J Miller; L Weiss
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1983-07

9.  Inactive X chromosome DNA does not function in DNA-mediated cell transformation for the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene.

Authors:  R M Liskay; R J Evans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Patterns of DNA replication of human chromosomes. II. Replication map and replication model.

Authors:  M Camargo; J Cervenka
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 11.025

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Replication patterns of the fragile X in heterozygous carriers: analysis by a BrdUrd antibody method.

Authors:  H Ohashi; A Kuwano; M Tsukahara; T Arinami; T Kajii
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  A practical metaphase marker of the inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  D L Van Dyke; W L Flejter; M J Worsham; J R Roberson; J V Higgins; H M Herr; S Knuutila; N Wang; V R Babu; L Weiss
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Metaphase chromosome folds and X-inactivation.

Authors:  M G Butler; G M Joseph; V G Dev
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1987-03

4.  Inactivated X chromosome fold in human leukemia and related clonal disorders.

Authors:  M R Avalos; C Léonard; F Mielot; G Tchernia
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  The human inactivated X chromosome folds in early metaphase, prometaphase, and prophase.

Authors:  D L Van Dyke; M Worsham; L Weiss
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Mapping of the Menkes locus to Xq13.3 distal to the X-inactivation center by an intrachromosomal insertion of the segment Xq13.3-q21.2.

Authors:  Z Tümer; N Tommerup; T Tønnesen; J Kreuder; I W Craig; N Horn
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Isodicentric X chromosome in a patient with Turner syndrome--implications for localization of the X-inactivation center.

Authors:  A L Pettigrew; E R McCabe; F F Elder; D H Ledbetter
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  XY chromosome behaviour in the germ-line of the human male: a FISH analysis of spatial orientation, chromatin condensation and pairing.

Authors:  S J Armstrong; A J Kirkham; M A Hultén
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Location of the X inactivation center in primates and other mammals.

Authors:  W L Flejter; D L Van Dyke; L Weiss
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.132

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.