Literature DB >> 6881211

The origin of inverted tandem duplications, and phenotypic effects of tandem duplication of the X chromosome long arm.

D L Van Dyke, M J Miller, L Weiss.   

Abstract

Tandem repeats of chromosome material can arise as inverted or as direct duplications. Such duplications of the X chromosome are instructive regarding X-linked genetic determinants of phenotype. We describe a 40-year-old woman with a direct duplication Xq13.3 to Xq27.2, short stature, gonadal dysgenesis, and secondary amenorrhea. Comparison of her phenotype with that of two other women with a direct duplication of part of Xq confirms the existence of statural determinants within the region X13 to Xq21, determinants of ovarian function within X22 to X27, and the X inactivation center within or proximal to band Xq13.3. In humans, direct duplications are more frequent than inverted, but both forms are rare. The mean age of parents is normal in subjects with direct duplications, but is advanced in subjects with inverted duplications. An inverted duplication can arise from a three-break rearrangement that includes a U-type exchange; a similar origin (two breaks and a U-type exchange) and a parental age association can be postulated for dicentric inverted duplications including dicentric isochromosome X.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6881211     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320150309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  11 in total

1.  Duplication 17q mosaicism: an infant with features of Ellis-van Creveld syndrome.

Authors:  A Serotkin; J Stamberg; L Waber
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Inherited X-chromosome inverted tandem duplication in a male traced to a grandparental mitotic error.

Authors:  S Schwartz; M F Schwartz; S R Panny; C J Peterson; E Waters; M M Cohen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A practical metaphase marker of the inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  D L Van Dyke; W L Flejter; M J Worsham; J R Roberson; J V Higgins; H M Herr; S Knuutila; N Wang; V R Babu; L Weiss
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  De novo direct tandem duplication of the proximal long arm of chromosome 2: 46,XX,dir dup(2)(q11 X 2q14 X 2).

Authors:  Y Mu; D L Van Dyke; L Weiss; S Olgac
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Reproductive outcomes of paracentric inversion carriers: report of a liveborn dicentric recombinant and literature review.

Authors:  E H Mules; J Stamberg
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Bends in human mitotic metaphase chromosomes, including a bend marking the X-inactivation center.

Authors:  W L Flejter; D L Van Dyke; L Weiss
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 7.  Robinow syndrome: report of two patients and review of literature.

Authors:  M G Butler; W B Wadlington
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  A familial inverted duplication/deletion of 2p25.1-25.3 provides new clues on the genesis of inverted duplications.

Authors:  Maria Clara Bonaglia; Roberto Giorda; Angelo Massagli; Rita Galluzzi; Roberto Ciccone; Orsetta Zuffardi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Molecular cytogenetic characterisation of a mosaic add(12)(p13.3) with an inv dup(3)(q26.31 --> qter) detected in an autistic boy.

Authors:  Isabel M Carreira; Joana B Melo; Carlos Rodrigues; Liesbeth Backx; Joris Vermeesch; Anja Weise; Nadezda Kosyakova; Guiomar Oliveira; Eunice Matoso
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Trisomy Xp and partial tetrasomy Xq resulting from gain of a rearranged X chromosome in a female fetus: pathogenic or not?

Authors:  Maria Yiu; Zhongxia Qi; Anita Ki; Jingwei Yu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.