Literature DB >> 6530926

Optimizing tissue contrast in magnetic resonance imaging.

R E Hendrick, T R Nelson, W R Hendee.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging demands that tissue contrast and signal-to-noise advantages be sought in each component of the imaging system. One component of magnetic resonance imaging in which contrast and signal-to-noise ratios are easily manipulated is in the choice of pulse sequences and interpulse delay times. This article provides a general method for determining the best choices of interpulse delay times in pulse sequences and applies that method to saturation recovery, inversion recovery, and spin-echo sequences. Saturation recovery and inversion recovery sequences with rephasing pulses, and tissues with unequal hydrogen densities are considered. Optimization of pulse sequences is carried out for the two distinct cases of (a) a fixed number of sequence repetitions and (b) a fixed total imaging time. Analytic expressions are derived or approximate expressions are provided for the interpulse delay times that optimize contrast-to-noise ratios in each pulse sequence. The acceptable range of interpulse delay times to obtain reasonable contrast using each pulse sequence is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6530926     DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(84)90005-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  8 in total

1.  The Dixon technique and the frequency-selective fat suppression technique in three-dimensional T1 weighted MRI of the liver: a comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of hepatocellular carcinomas-to-liver.

Authors:  Y Takatsu; T Akasaka; T Miyati
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Changes in T1 relaxation processes in the bone marrow following treatment in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  K E Jensen; C Thomsen; O Henriksen; H Hertz; H K Johansen; M Yssing
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1990

3.  A model for MRI contrast enhancement using T1 agents.

Authors:  E T Ahrens; U Rothbächer; R E Jacobs; S E Fraser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Optimization of survey protocols for MRI.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; R M Henkelman; M J Bronskill
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Phase and sensitivity of receiver coils in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; M J Bronskill; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Optimization of MR protocols: a statistical decision analysis approach.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; M J Bronskill; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Basic principles of magnetic resonance imaging--an update.

Authors:  A L Scherzinger; W R Hendee
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-12

8.  Optimization of Regularization Parameters in Compressed Sensing of Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Can Statistical Image Metrics Mimic Radiologists' Perception?

Authors:  Thai Akasaka; Koji Fujimoto; Takayuki Yamamoto; Tomohisa Okada; Yasutaka Fushimi; Akira Yamamoto; Toshiyuki Tanaka; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.