Literature DB >> 25833350

The Dixon technique and the frequency-selective fat suppression technique in three-dimensional T1 weighted MRI of the liver: a comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of hepatocellular carcinomas-to-liver.

Y Takatsu1, T Akasaka, T Miyati.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The use of three-dimensional T1 weighted gradient echo sequences such as the Dixon technique and the frequency-selective fat suppression (FS) technique is currently widely accepted method in MRI examinations of the liver. To assess the image qualities of the Dixon technique and the frequency-selective FS technique, the contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-to-liver and fat-to-liver were compared between the two techniques in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) following administration of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid.
METHODS: MR images of 59 patients with a total of 86 HCCs were retrospectively evaluated. Images were consecutively obtained with the Dixon and frequency-selective FS methods in the HBP and their CNRs of HCC-to-liver and fat-to-liver were compared. CNRs and contrast ratios were calculated by the mean value of the liver parenchyma, HCC, fat and standard deviation of the liver parenchyma. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The median CNRs for the frequency-selective FS and Dixon techniques of HCC-to-liver were 4.3 and 5.4 (p < 0.01), mesenteric fat-to-liver were 9.9 and 12.8 (p < 0.01) and subcutaneous fat-to-liver were 9.9 and 13.2 (p < 0.01), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The Dixon technique yielded higher CNRs of HCC-to-liver than that of the frequency-selective FS technique. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: There are a limited number of reports on quantitative analysis of the image qualities of the Dixon technique and the frequency-selective FS technique, particularly within the same patient and examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25833350      PMCID: PMC4628460          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  21 in total

1.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  Gadolinium-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging using a 2-point Dixon fat-water separation technique: impact upon image quality and lesion detection.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Lorenzo Mannelli; Sungheon Kim; James S Babb
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Dual-echo Dixon imaging with flexible choice of echo times.

Authors:  Holger Eggers; Bernhard Brendel; Adri Duijndam; Gwenael Herigault
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Dixon techniques for water and fat imaging.

Authors:  Jingfei Ma
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Thorsten A Bley; Oliver Wieben; Christopher J François; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Fast three-dimensional dual echo dixon technique improves fat suppression in breast MRI.

Authors:  Huong Le-Petross; Vikas Kundra; Janio Szklaruk; Wei Wei; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Jingfei Ma
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-echo dual echo (3D-FSPGR-DE) with water reconstruction: preliminary experience with a novel pulse sequence for gadolinium-enhanced abdominal MR imaging.

Authors:  Russell N Low; Neeraj Panchal; Anthony T Vu; Adrian Knowles; Lloyd Estkowski; Zachary Slavens; Jingfei Ma
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Evaluation of optimized inversion-recovery fat-suppression techniques for T2-weighted abdominal MR imaging.

Authors:  Thomas C Lauenstein; Puneet Sharma; Timothy Hughes; Keith Heberlein; Dana Tudorascu; Diego R Martin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Respiratory-triggered versus breath-hold diffusion-weighted MRI of liver lesions: comparison of image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient values.

Authors:  Harsh Kandpal; Raju Sharma; K S Madhusudhan; Kulwant Singh Kapoor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  8 in total

1.  A mask method to assess the uniformity of fat suppression in phantom studies.

Authors:  Yasuo Takatsu; Masafumi Nakamura; Kenichiro Yamamura; Satoshi Sawa; Masaki Asahara; Michitaka Honda; Tosiaki Miyati
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2019-08-17

2.  Fat-only Dixon: how to use it in body MRI.

Authors:  Reza Salari; David H Ballard; Mark J Hoegger; Daniel Young; Anup S Shetty
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  Evaluation of two-point Dixon water-fat separation for liver specific contrast-enhanced assessment of liver maximum capacity.

Authors:  Michael Haimerl; Ute Probst; Stefanie Poelsterl; Claudia Fellner; Dominik Nickel; Kilian Weigand; Stefan M Brunner; Florian Zeman; Christian Stroszczynski; Philipp Wiggermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Noninvasive Quantitative Detection Methods of Liver Fat Content in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Shujing Lv; Sushan Jiang; Shousheng Liu; Quanjiang Dong; Yongning Xin; Shiying Xuan
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2018-06-22

5.  A preferred patient decubitus positioning for magnetic resonance image guided online adaptive radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Yazheng Chen; Xinfeng Chen; William Hall; Phil Prior; Ying Zhang; Eric Paulson; Jinyi Lang; Beth Erickson; X Allen Li
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-11-20

6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Standalone T2 Dixon Sequence Compared with Conventional MRI in Sacroiliitis.

Authors:  R Athira; Seetharaman Cannane; R Thushara; Santhosh Poyyamoli; Meena Nedunchelian
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-23

7.  Pelvic MRI and CT images are interchangeable for measuring peripouch fat.

Authors:  Xian Hua Gao; Nan Lan; Hanumant Chouhan; Luca Stocchi; Erick Remer; Bo Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Assessment of the Quality of Breast MR Imaging Using the Modified Dixon Method and Frequency-Selective Fat Suppression: A Phantom Study.

Authors:  Yasuo Takatsu; Katsusuke Kyotani; Tsuyoshi Ueyama; Tosiaki Miyati; Kenichirou Yamamura; Atsushi Andou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.471

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.