Literature DB >> 3780378

Stimulus investigative range in the perimetry of retinitis pigmentosa: some preliminary findings.

J M Wood, J M Wild, P A Good, S J Crews.   

Abstract

The manipulation of perimetric stimulus parameters over a given dynamic range has been reported to provide diagnostic information additional to that of changes in differential sensitivity. Preliminary studies (Flanagan et al., 1984a) have indicated that the perimetric response in retinitis pigmentosa behaves atypically over a range of stimulus combinations and strategies. The current study investigated the perimetric response of 17 retinitis pigmentosa patients of various genetic types over a range of stimulus parameters (target size, presentation time and background luminance) and test strategies (kinetic and threshold static) using the Octopus automated perimeter, the Goldmann and Tubinger bowl perimeters and the Dicon Autoperimeter 3000. Statokinetic dissociation was found to be present with large target sizes at 10 asb and 31.5 asb bowl luminances. Some patients demonstrated enhanced sensitivity to shorter stimulus presentations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3780378     DOI: 10.1007/bf00160762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  33 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  A DUBOIS-POULSEN; C MAGIS
Journal:  Bibl Ophthalmol       Date:  1957

2.  Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision.

Authors:  J J Kulikowski; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of moving visual stimulus.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The Riddoch phenomenon revealed in non-occipital lobe lesions.

Authors:  R J Zappia; J M Enoch; R Stamper; J Z Winkelman; A J Gay
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Dynamic range and stray light. An estimate of the falsifying effects of stray light in perimetry.

Authors:  F Fankhauser; H Haeberlin
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  The qualitative comparative analysis of the visual field using computer assisted, semi-automated and manual instrumentation: III. Clinical analysis.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; J M Wild; D A Barnes; B A Gilmartin; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Variability of visual field measurements in normal subjects and patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  D F Ross; G A Fishman; L D Gilbert; R J Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-07

8.  Differential light threshold in automated static perimetry. Factors influencing short-term fluctuation.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance; F Fankhauser; L Augustiny
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-06

9.  Manipulation of sensitivity in visual field investigation.

Authors:  D A Barnes; J M Wild; J G Flanagan; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-06-30       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Rod-cone interaction in flicker perimetry: evidence for a distal retinal locus.

Authors:  K R Alexander; G A Fishman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-08-15       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.

Authors:  M Dengler-Harles; J M Wild; M D Cole; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.117

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.