Literature DB >> 6461723

Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants.

D B Pisoni, R N Aslin, A J Perey, B L Hennessy.   

Abstract

For many years there has been a consensus that early linguistic experience exerts a profound and often permanent effect on the perceptual abilities underlying the identification and discrimination of stop consonants. It has also been concluded that selective modification of the perception of stop consonants cannot be accomplished easily and quickly in the laboratory with simple discrimination training techniques. In the present article we report the results of three experiments that examined the perception of a three-way voicing contrast by naive monolingual speakers of English. Laboratory training procedures were implemented with a small computer in a real-time environment to examine the perception of voiced, voiceless unaspirated, and voiceless aspirated stops differing in voice onset time. Three perceptual categories were present for most subjects after only a few minutes of exposure to the novel contrast. Subsequent perceptual tests revealed reliable and consistent labeling and categorical-like discrimination functions for all three voicing categories, even though one of the contrasts is not phonologically distinctive in English. The present results demonstrate that the perceptual mechanisms used by adults in categorizing stop consonants can be modified easily with simple laboratory techniques in a short period of time.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6461723      PMCID: PMC3495319          DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.2.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

Review 1.  THE MOTOR THEORY OF SPEECH PERCEPTION: A CRITICAL REVIEW.

Authors:  H LANE
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  On the discriminative control of concurrent responses: the relations among response frequency, latency, and topography in auditory generalization.

Authors:  D V CROSS; H L LANE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reconditioning a consonant discrimination in an aphasic: an experimental case history.

Authors:  H L LANE; D J MOORE
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1962-08

4.  Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception.

Authors:  D B Pisoni
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-01

5.  Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: implications for voicing perception in stops.

Authors:  D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1973-06-01

7.  Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Jeffrey Tash
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1974

8.  Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum.

Authors:  D B Pisoni; J H Lazarus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: the case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals.

Authors:  A Caramazza; G H Yeni-Komshian; E B Zurif; E Carbone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Adaptation of the category boundary between speech and nonspeech: a case against feature detectors.

Authors:  R E Remez
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  33 in total

1.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system.

Authors:  C T Best; G W McRoberts; E Goodell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception.

Authors:  Bruce D McCandliss; Julie A Fiez; Athanassios Protopapas; Mary Conway; James L McClelland
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Enhancing speech learning by combining task practice with periods of stimulus exposure without practice.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Melissa M Baese-Berk; Nicole Marrone; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Varying irrelevant phonetic features hinders learning of the feature being trained.

Authors:  Mark Antoniou; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Characterizing the influence of native language experience on adult speech perception.

Authors:  L Polka
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-07

6.  Training to use voice onset time as a cue to talker identification induces a left-ear/right-hemisphere processing advantage.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Courtney Driscoll
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  The role of selective attention in the acquisition of English tense and lax vowels by native Spanish listeners: comparison of three training methods.

Authors:  Maria V Kondaurova; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2010-10-01

8.  The relationship between native allophonic experience with vowel duration and perception of the English tense/lax vowel contrast by Spanish and Russian listeners.

Authors:  Maria V Kondaurova; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Natalya Kaganovich; Courtney Driscoll-Huber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference.

Authors:  Naomi H Feldman; Thomas L Griffiths; James L Morgan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.