Literature DB >> 21499531

The role of selective attention in the acquisition of English tense and lax vowels by native Spanish listeners: comparison of three training methods.

Maria V Kondaurova1, Alexander L Francis.   

Abstract

This study investigates the role of two processes, cue enhancement (learning to attend to acoustic cues which characterize a speech contrast for native listeners) and cue inhibition (learning to ignore cues that do not), in the acquisition of the American English tense and lax ([i] vs.[I]) vowels by native Spanish listeners. This contrast is acoustically distinguished by both vowel spectrum and duration. However, while native English listeners rely primarily on spectrum, inexperienced Spanish listeners tend to rely exclusively on duration. Twenty-nine native Spanish listeners, initially reliant on vowel duration, received either enhancement training, inhibition training, or training with a natural cue distribution. Results demonstrated that reliance on spectrum properties increased over baseline for all three groups. However, inhibitory training was more effective relative to enhancement training and both inhibitory and enhancement training were more effective relative to natural distribution training in decreasing listeners' attention to duration. These results suggest that phonetic learning may involve two distinct cognitive processes, cue enhancement and cue inhibition, that function to shift selective attention between separable acoustic dimensions. Moreover, cue-specific training (whether enhancing or inhibitory) appears to be more effective for the acquisition of second language speech contrasts.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21499531      PMCID: PMC3076995          DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phon        ISSN: 0095-4470


  50 in total

1.  The effects of experimental variables on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese listeners.

Authors:  R A Yamada; Y Tohkura
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

2.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

3.  Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: a comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults.

Authors:  Paul Iverson; Valerie Hazan; Kerry Bannister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese.

Authors:  John S Pruitt; James J Jenkins; Winifred Strange
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech sounds.

Authors:  Travis Wade; Allard Jongman; Joan Sereno
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  Theoretical notes. Motor theory of speech perception: a reply to Lane's critical review.

Authors:  M Studdert-Kennedy; A M Liberman; K S Harris; F S Cooper
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English.

Authors:  J E Flege; J Hillenbrand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories.

Authors:  S E Lively; J S Logan; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling.

Authors:  P Iverson; P K Kuhl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  L1-Spanish speakers' acquisition of the English /i/-I/ contrast: duration-based perception is not the initial developmental stage.

Authors:  Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.500

View more
  9 in total

1.  Learning Additional Languages as Hierarchical Probabilistic Inference: Insights From First Language Processing.

Authors:  Bozena Pajak; Alex B Fine; Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Learn       Date:  2016-03-14

Review 2.  Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Adam T Tierney; Giada Guerra; Aeron Laffere; Frederic Dick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories.

Authors:  Jessamyn Schertz; Taehong Cho; Andrew Lotto; Natasha Warner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The role of abstraction in non-native speech perception.

Authors:  Bozena Pajak; Roger Levy
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2014-09-01

5.  Effect of explicit dimensional instruction on speech category learning.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Han-Gyol Yi; Kirsten E Smayda; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Learning, neural plasticity and sensitive periods: implications for language acquisition, music training and transfer across the lifespan.

Authors:  Erin J White; Stefanie A Hutka; Lynne J Williams; Sylvain Moreno
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20

7.  The Role of Temporal Acoustic Exaggeration in High Variability Phonetic Training: A Behavioral and ERP Study.

Authors:  Bing Cheng; Xiaojuan Zhang; Siying Fan; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-24

8.  Observed effects of "distributional learning" may not relate to the number of peaks. A test of "dispersion" as a confounding factor.

Authors:  Karin Wanrooij; Paul Boersma; Titia Benders
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15

9.  Distributional vowel training is less effective for adults than for infants. A study using the mismatch response.

Authors:  Karin Wanrooij; Paul Boersma; Titia L van Zuijen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.