Literature DB >> 6459408

The acoustic correlates of "speechlike": a use of the suffix effect.

J Morton, S M Marcus, P Ottley.   

Abstract

The stimulus suffix paradigm has been used to establish the importance of precategorical acoustic storage (PAS) as a theoretical construct in the investigation of attention and speech perception. Morton and Chambers concluded that sounds must have typical "speechlike" properties extracted at an early stage of processing in order to act as suffixes. In this article we use the suffix effect to investigate the conditions under which a sound is treated by the acoustic system as speechlike. On the basis of our findings we then perform other studies that reaffirm the essentially precategorical nature of the memory source termed PAS by Crowder and Morton. In Experiments 1-13 we demonstrate the complex basis on which sounds are classified. Our experiments show that a completely regular sound, in which a single pitch pulse from a naturally spoken vowel was repeatedly reproduced, still produced a substantial suffix effect. In addition a natural sound had to be quite severely filtered before the suffix effect began to vanish. However, a combination of regularity and filtering proved very effective, the two dimensions dramatically interacting in neutralizing the effect of the sound as a suffix. In two further experiments (14 and 15) we show that the classification parameters can be shifted by changing the acoustic properties of the stimulus list. However, forcing the subjects to make a linguistic classification of suffix sounds did not lead to any changes in their potency as suffixes. The classification of sounds, and thus the suffix effect, is an acoustic question, not a subjective one. The distinction between subjective and acoustic influences was further demonstrated when subjects rated a variety of sounds for their naturalness and for their similarity to the original suffix (Experiments 17-22). These measures showed themselves sensitive to the filtering operations we performed but, unlike measures of suffix effectiveness, were insensitive to regularity. Another suffix that produced a full suffix effect was shown to be rated as very nonspeechlike. Contrary to recent claims, these results reinforce our view of a distinction between central, subjectively controllable factors and a strong precategorical effect that is automatic in action and is based on the decision of whether a sound is speechlike.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6459408     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.110.4.568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  10 in total

1.  Abstract versus modality-specific memory representations in processing auditory and visual speech.

Authors:  B de Gelder; J Vroomen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

2.  Serial recall of two-voice lists: implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects.

Authors:  R L Greene
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-01

3.  Two-component theory of the suffix effect: contrary evidence.

Authors:  Lance C Bloom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

Review 4.  A feature model of immediate memory.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

Review 5.  A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-07

6.  Adding sound to lipread lists: the effects on serial recall of adding an auditory pulse train and a pure tone to silently lipread lists.

Authors:  R Campbell; J Garwood; S Rosen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-05

7.  Adapting to an irrelevant item in an immediate recall task.

Authors:  M J Watkins; E S Sechler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-11

8.  Voice change in the stimulus suffix effect: are the effects structural or strategic?

Authors:  S N Greenberg; R W Engle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-09

9.  A common basis for auditory sensory storage in perception and immediate memory.

Authors:  R G Crowder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-05

10.  The Item versus the Object in Memory: On the Implausibility of Overwriting As a Mechanism for Forgetting in Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  C Philip Beaman; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.