Literature DB >> 6452501

Why two eyes are better than one: the two views of binocular vision.

R K Jones, D N Lee.   

Abstract

Despite centuries of research on the topic, the answer to the question "'Are two eyes significantly better than one, independent of stereopsis?" is still uncertain. In this investigation, steps are taken toward answering the question in a behavioral context. Three sets of experiments are reported in which human binocular and monocular performance are compared in a variety of exteroceptive and visuomotor tasks. In all of the experiments, two eyes facilitated performance. The findings suggest that the binocular system is able to detect the matching information, that is, the concordance, in the monocular optic arrays and to use that information to increase visual efficiency. Furthermore, stereopsis was not found to be important in the performance of visuomotor skills in three dimensions when the subjects were free to move their heads. Thus, the results indicate that an important ecological benefit of binocular frontal vision is having binocular concordance, rather than having binocular disparity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6452501     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.7.1.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  41 in total

1.  Preschool hearing, speech, language, and vision screening.

Authors:  J Bamford; A Davis; J Boyle; J Law; S Chapman; S S Brown; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

Review 2.  Is a one eyed racing driver safe to compete? Formula one (eye) or two?

Authors:  W Westlake
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  The contribution of stereo vision to one-handed catching.

Authors:  Liesbeth I N Mazyn; Matthieu Lenoir; Gilles Montagne; Geert J P Savelsbergh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Nonlinearities in binocular visual evoked potentials in children.

Authors:  R T Paley; V G Sutija; H A Solan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Slow Reading in Glaucoma: Is it due to the Shrinking Visual Span in Central Vision?

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Rong Liu; Bhavika N Patel; Christopher Girkin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Perceptual learning improves stereoacuity in amblyopia.

Authors:  Jie Xi; Wu-Li Jia; Li-Xia Feng; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The distance of visual targets affects the spatial magnitude and multifractal scaling of standing body sway in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Justin Munafo; Christopher Curry; Michael G Wade; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Interocular yoking in human saccades examined by mutual information analysis.

Authors:  Masaki Maruyama; Peter Bc Fenwick; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Nonlinear Biomed Phys       Date:  2010-06-03

10.  Monocular blindness in Bayelsa state of Nigeria.

Authors:  Azonobi Ifeanyi Richard
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2010-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.