Literature DB >> 15221161

The contribution of stereo vision to one-handed catching.

Liesbeth I N Mazyn1, Matthieu Lenoir, Gilles Montagne, Geert J P Savelsbergh.   

Abstract

Participants with normal (StereoN) and weak (StereoW) stereopsis caught tennis balls under monocular and binocular viewing at three different speed conditions. Monocular or binocular viewing did not affect catching performance in catchers with weak stereopsis, while the StereoN group caught more balls under binocular vision as compared with the monocular condition. These effects were more pronounced with increasing ball speed. Kinematic analysis of the catch partially corroborated these findings. These results indicate that StereoW catchers have not developed a compensatory strategy for information pick-up, and that negative effects of a lack of stereopsis grow larger as temporal constraints become more severe. These findings also support the notion that several monocular and/or binocular information sources can be used in the control of interceptive action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15221161     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1926-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Acquiring an attacking forehand drive: the effects of static and dynamic environmental conditions.

Authors:  R J Bootsma; M H Houbiers; H T Whiting; P C van Wieringen
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 3.  Visual factors in hitting and catching.

Authors:  D Regan
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 4.  Does stereopsis matter in humans?

Authors:  A R Fielder; M J Moseley
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Time to contact and the control of manual prehension.

Authors:  M K Watson; L S Jakobson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Adaptation to telestereoscopic viewing measured by one-handed ball-catching performance.

Authors:  S J Judge; C M Bradford
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage.

Authors:  D Regan; K I Beverley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time.

Authors:  L Peper; R J Bootsma; D R Mestre; F C Bakker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Neurons in cat visual cortex tuned to the direction of motion in depth: effect of stimulus speed.

Authors:  D Regan; M Cynader
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Neurones in cat parastriate cortex sensitive to the direction of motion in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  M Cynader; D Regan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  22 in total

1.  Temporal integration property of stereopsis after higher-order aberration correction.

Authors:  Jian Kang; Yun Dai; Yudong Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Manual tracking in three dimensions.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; C C A M Gielen; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Two eyes in action.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Does the Level of Graphical Detail of a Virtual Handball Thrower Influence a Goalkeeper's Motor Response?

Authors:  Nicolas Vignais; Benoit Bideau; Cathy Craig; Sébastien Brault; Franck Multon; Paul Delamarche; Richard Kulpa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Advance knowledge effects on kinematics of one-handed catching.

Authors:  Pieter Tijtgat; Simon J Bennett; Geert J P Savelsbergh; Dirk De Clercq; Matthieu Lenoir
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The role of stereopsis (three-dimensional vision) in dentistry: review of the current literature.

Authors:  M Syrimi; N Ali
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  Age- and stereovision-dependent eye-hand coordination deficits in children with amblyopia and abnormal binocularity.

Authors:  Simon Grant; Catherine Suttle; Dean R Melmoth; Miriam L Conway; John J Sloper
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Impaired fine motor skills in children following extraction of a dense congenital or infantile unilateral cataract.

Authors:  Krista R Kelly; Sarah E Morale; Serena X Wang; David R Stager; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 1.220

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.