Literature DB >> 27255223

The distance of visual targets affects the spatial magnitude and multifractal scaling of standing body sway in younger and older adults.

Justin Munafo1, Christopher Curry1, Michael G Wade1, Thomas A Stoffregen2.   

Abstract

The spatial magnitude of standing body sway is greater during viewing of more distant targets and reduced when viewing nearby targets. Classical interpretations of this effect are based on the projective geometry of changes in visual stimulation that are brought about by body sway. Such explanations do not motivate predictions about the temporal dynamics of body sway. We asked whether the distance of visible targets would affect both the spatial magnitude and the multifractality of standing body sway. It has been suggested that the multifractality of movement may change with age. Separately, previous research has not addressed the effects of target distance on postural sway in older adults. For these reasons, we crossed our variation in target distance with variation in age. In an open-air setting, we measured standing body sway in younger and older adults while looking at visual targets that were placed at three distances. The distance of visual targets affected the spatial magnitude of body sway in younger adults, replicating past studies. Target distance also affected the spatial magnitude of sway in older adults, confirming that this relation persists despite other age-related changes. Target distance also affected the multifractality of body sway, but this effect was modulated by age. Finally, the width of the multifractal spectrum was greater for older adults than for younger adults, revealing that healthy aging can affect the multifractality of movement. These findings reveal similarities and differences between the spatial magnitude and the multifractality of human movement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Posture; Visual performance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27255223     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4676-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Ability of static and statistical mechanics posturographic measures to distinguish between age and fall risk.

Authors:  James A Norris; Anthony P Marsh; Ian J Smith; Robert I Kohut; Michael E Miller
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Postural sway during dual tasks in young and elderly adults.

Authors:  Janina M Prado; Thomas A Stoffregen; Marcos Duarte
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 3.  Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: is there a connection?

Authors:  Nicholas Stergiou; Leslie M Decker
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults.

Authors:  T E Prieto; J B Myklebust; R G Hoffmann; E G Lovett; B M Myklebust
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Differential effects of retinal target displacement, changing size and changing disparity in the control of anterior/posterior and lateral body sway.

Authors:  W Paulus; A Straube; S Krafczyk; T Brandt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The medium of haptic perception: a tensegrity hypothesis.

Authors:  Michael T Turvey; Sérgio T Fonseca
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Visually induced postural sway in anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Mark S Redfern; Joseph M Furman; Rolf G Jacob
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2006-10-12

8.  Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories.

Authors:  J J Collins; C J De Luca
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The influence of center-of-mass movements on the variation in the structure of human postural sway.

Authors:  Espen A F Ihlen; Nina Skjæret; Beatrix Vereijken
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Fractal fluctuations in quiet standing predict the use of mechanical information for haptic perception.

Authors:  Zsolt Palatinus; James A Dixon; Damian G Kelty-Stephen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.934

View more
  7 in total

1.  Postural time-to-contact as a precursor of visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Ruixuan Li; Hannah Walter; Christopher Curry; Ruth Rath; Nicolette Peterson; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Postural sway in men and women during nauseogenic motion of the illuminated environment.

Authors:  Frank Koslucher; Justin Munafo; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The virtual reality head-mounted display Oculus Rift induces motion sickness and is sexist in its effects.

Authors:  Justin Munafo; Meg Diedrick; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The Rim and the Ancient Mariner: The Nautical Horizon Affects Postural Sway in Older Adults.

Authors:  Justin Munafo; Michael G Wade; Nick Stergiou; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The Two Faces of Postural Control in Older Adults: Stability and Function.

Authors:  Ruth Rath; Michael G Wade
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 8.143

6.  Multifractal evidence of nonlinear interactions stabilizing posture for phasmids in windy conditions: A reanalysis of insect postural-sway data.

Authors:  Damian G Kelty-Stephen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Influence of Controlled Stomatognathic Motor Activity on Sway, Control and Stability of the Center of Mass During Dynamic Steady-State Balance-An Uncontrolled Manifold Analysis.

Authors:  Cagla Fadillioglu; Lisa Kanus; Felix Möhler; Steffen Ringhof; Daniel Hellmann; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.