Literature DB >> 6452074

Twitch, tetanus and train-of-four as indices of recovery from nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade.

H H Ali, J J Savarese, P W Lebowitz, F M Ramsey.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare the sensitivities of the train-of-four response (2 Hz for 2 s), the single twitch (0.15 Hz), and the tetanic response (50 Hz for 5 s) as indices of residual nondepolarizing block. Spontaneous or induced recovery of evoked thumb adduction in response to ulnar nerve stimulation was studied. One hundred and seven adult surgical patients were divided according to the relaxant used, into six groups. We found that when the single twitch recovered to control height, the train-of-four ratio was well below 1.0. This ratio was significantly lower during spontaneous recovery than following neostigmine antagonism of the block (P less than 0.01). The tetanic response was fully sustained when the train-of-four ratio was above 0.7. When the ratio was less than 0.7, variable degrees of fade of tetanus were evident. Analysis of variance indicated similar train-of-four ratios among the six groups at complete recovery of the single twitch irrespective of the relaxant technique used (P less than 0.1). It is concluded that a train-of-four ratio of 0.7 or higher reliably indicates the recovery of the single twitch to control height and a sustained response to tetanic stimulation at 50 Hz for 5 s. The clinical significance of this study is as follows: the train-of-four response provides the same indication of clinical recovery from nondepolarizing block as obtained from tetanic stimulation at a physiological frequency; and reliance on the recovery of the single twitch to control height as a criterion of spontaneous return to normal clinical neuromuscular function may be misleading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6452074     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198104000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  17 in total

1.  What anesthesiologist should know about neuromuscular monitoring today?

Authors:  N Ueda; T Muteki; H Tsuda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Newer neuromuscular blocking agents: how do they compare with established agents?

Authors:  H J Sparr; T M Beaufort; T Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Correlation between integrated evoked EMG and respiratory function following atracurium administration in unanaesthetized humans.

Authors:  M D Sharpe; A M Lam; J F Nicholas; D C Chung; R Merchant; W Alyafi; R Beauchamp
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Comparison of neuromuscular blockade in upper facial and hypothenar muscles.

Authors:  M P Paloheimo; R C Wilson; H L Edmonds; L F Lucas; A N Triantafillou
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1988-10

Review 5.  Clinical use of peripheral nerve stimulators in anaesthesia.

Authors:  E Hudes; K C Lee
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Recovery of train-of-four after mivacurium.

Authors:  S J Brull; N R Connelly; D G Silverman
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 7.  Neuromuscular blocking drugs in anaesthesia.

Authors:  F Donati; J C Bevan; D R Bevan
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1984-05

8.  Clinical assessment of the muscular response to tetanic nerve stimulation.

Authors:  J Y Dupuis; R Martin; J M Tessonnier; J P Tétrault
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vecuronium bromide.

Authors:  T Nomura
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 10.  Mivacurium. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in general anaesthesia.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Donna McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.