Literature DB >> 11434449

Newer neuromuscular blocking agents: how do they compare with established agents?

H J Sparr1, T M Beaufort, T Fuchs-Buder.   

Abstract

Rapacuronium bromide (rapacuronium; ORG-9487) is a nondepolarising muscle relaxant (NMBA) with a low potency [90% effective dose (ED90) 1 mg/kg], which to some extent is responsible for its rapid onset of action. Because of the high plasma clearance (5.3 to 11.1 mg/kg/min) of rapacuronium, its clinical duration of action following single bolus doses up to 2 mg/kg in adults is short (i.e. <20 minutes). Rapacuronium forms a pharmacologically active 3-desacetyl metabolite, ORG-9488, which may contribute to a delay in spontaneous recovery after repeat bolus doses or infusions. After rapacuronium 1.5 mg/kg clinically acceptable intubating conditions are achieved within 60 to 90 seconds in the majority of adult and elderly patients undergoing elective anaesthesia. However, in a rapid-sequence setting. intubating conditions are less favourable after rapacuronium 1.5 to 2.5 mg/kg than after succinylcholine. The most prominent adverse effects of rapacuronium (tachycardia, hypotension and bronchospasm) are dose-related, and in particular pulmonary adverse effects are observed more frequently under conditions of a rapid-sequence induction in adults. Therefore, it seems worthwhile to consider only doses of rapacuronium < or = 1.5 mg/kg to facilitate rapid tracheal intubation, and to use succinylcholine or rocuronium rather than rapacuronium in a rapid-sequence setting. Rapacuronium, however, is a suitable alternative to mivacurium chloride (mivacurium) and succinylcholine for short procedures (e.g. ambulatory anaesthesia). Rocuronium bromide (rocuronium) is a relatively low-potent, intermediateacting NMBA. Its main advantage is the rapid onset of neuromuscular block whereby good or excellent intubating conditions are achieved within 60 to 90 seconds after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg (2 x ED95), and within 60 to 180 seconds after smaller doses (1 to 1.5 x ED95). Larger doses of rocuronium (> or = 1 mg/kg) seem to be suitable for rapid-sequence induction under relatively light anaesthesia. However, it is still a matter of controversy whether, in the case of an unanticipated difficult intubation, the long duration of rocuronium administered in such large doses outweighs the many adverse effects of succinylcholine. Rocuronium has mild vagolytic effects and does not release histamine, even when administered in large doses. Rocuronium is primarily eliminated via the liver and its pharmacokinetic profile is similar to that of vecuronium bromide (vecuronium). Unlike vecuronium, rocuronium has no metabolite. Cisatracurium besilate (cisatracurium), the IR-cis, 1'R-cis isomer of atracurium besilate (atracurium) is approximately 4 times more potent than atracurium. The onset time of cisatracurium is significantly slower than after equipotent doses of atracurium. The recommended intubating dose is 0.15 to 0.2 mg/kg (3 to 4 times ED95). Over a wide range of clinically relevant doses the recovery properties of cisatracurium are affected by neither the size of the bolus dose nor by the duration of infusion. Unlike atracurium, cisatracurium does not trigger histamine release. Like atracurium, cisatracurium undergoes Hofmann elimination. In contrast to atracurium, cisatracurium does not undergo hydrolysis by nonspecific plasma esterases. Moreover, about 77% of the drug is cleared by organ-dependent mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11434449     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200161070-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  186 in total

1.  Severe bronchospasm and desaturation in a child associated with rapacuronium.

Authors:  S S Kron
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Rapacuronium for modified rapid sequence induction in elective caesarean section: neuromuscular blocking effects and safety compared with succinylcholine, and placental transfer.

Authors:  E I Abouleish; T K Abboud; G Bikhazi; C A Kenaan; L Mroz; J Zhu; J Lee; T S Abboud
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of cisatracurium in geriatric surgical patients.

Authors:  E Ornstein; C A Lien; R S Matteo; N D Ostapkovich; J Diaz; K B Wolf
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Rapid tracheal intubation with large-dose rocuronium: a probability-based approach.

Authors:  T Heier; J E Caldwell
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Time course of action and intubating conditions following vecuronium, rocuronium and mivacurium.

Authors:  J M Wierda; F D Hommes; H J Nap; L van den Broek
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  The FDA protects the public by regulating the manufacture of anesthetic agents and the production devices used in anesthetic practice.

Authors:  R F Bedford
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  The pharmacology of atracurium: a new competitive neuromuscular blocking agent.

Authors:  R Hughes; D J Chapple
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Evaluation of intubating conditions with rocuronium and either propofol or etomidate for rapid sequence induction.

Authors:  H J Skinner; A Biswas; R P Mahajan
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Early and late reversibility of rocuronium bromide.

Authors:  L van den Broek; J H Proost; J M Wierda
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl       Date:  1994

10.  Histamine release during the administration of atracurium or vecuronium in children.

Authors:  N G Goudsouzian; E T Young; J Moss; L M Liu
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  [Residual neuromuscular blockades. Clinical consequences, frequency and avoidance strategies].

Authors:  T Fuchs-Buder; M Eikermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Neuromuscular blockades. Agents, monitoring and antagonism].

Authors:  J-U Schreiber; T Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Succinylcholine: once written off...].

Authors:  T Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Feasibility of intraoperative neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery after administration of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents.

Authors:  Koung-Shing Chu; Sheng-Hua Wu; I-Cheng Lu; Cheng-Jing Tsai; Che-Wei Wu; Wen-Rei Kuo; Ka-Wo Lee; Feng-Yu Chiang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Cough suppressant and pharmacologic protussive therapy: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Donald C Bolser
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 6.  Sugammadex: a review of its use in anaesthetic practice.

Authors:  Lily P H Yang; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Comparative pharmacodynamics of pancuronium, cisatracurium, and CW002 in rabbits.

Authors:  Leslie L Diaz; Jingwei Zhang; Paul M Heerdt
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Reversal of profound vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block under sevoflurane anesthesia: sugammadex versus neostigmine.

Authors:  Hendrikus Jm Lemmens; Mohammad I El-Orbany; James Berry; Jovino Ben Morte; Gavin Martin
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Effect of ulinastatin on the rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  Min Soo Kim; Jung Woo Park; Yun Hee Lim; Byung Hoon Yoo; Jun Heum Yon; Dong Won Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-03-21

10.  Anesthesiologist's satisfaction using between cisatracurium and rocuronium for the intubation in the anesthesia induced by remifentanil and propofol.

Authors:  Hyunjung Lee; Sinho Jeong; Cheolhun Choi; Hyejin Jeong; Seongheon Lee; Seongwook Jeong
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.