Literature DB >> 3193148

Comparison of neuromuscular blockade in upper facial and hypothenar muscles.

M P Paloheimo1, R C Wilson, H L Edmonds, L F Lucas, A N Triantafillou.   

Abstract

Facial and hand muscles are used frequently for monitoring neuromuscular blockade. Therefore, we compared changes in electrically evoked muscle potential magnitude in upper facial and hypothenar muscles after fixed doses of neuromuscular blockers (succinylcholine, 750 micrograms/kg; pancuronium, 70 micrograms/kg; vecuronium, 50 micrograms/kg; and atracurium, 300 micrograms/kg). Face-hand comparisons were made in both anesthetized (nitrous oxide/narcotic, n = 51) and comatose (closed-head injuries, n = 5) patients. In 24 anesthetized patients, complete blockade of the hypothenar muscles prevented quantitative comparison. In the remaining 27 patients, the relaxant effect (as determined by the percentage change from prerelaxant baseline muscle potentials) was significantly smaller (P less than 0.0001) in the upper facial muscles (65 +/- 24% versus 92 +/- 8%, mean +/- SD). All four evoked muscle responses to train-of-four stimulation were detectable in upper facial muscles of the 19 patients receiving non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs; this pattern was seen in hand muscles of only 7 patients (P less than 0.001). The neuromuscular blockade in both the hand (49 +/- 54%) and the upper facial area (68 +/- 28%, P greater than 0.05) of comatose patients was smaller and more variable than that seen during anesthesia. These results illustrate the value of quantitative monitoring of neuromuscular function, especially during highly variable and unpredictable drug-induced blockade in the comatose state. We conclude that during narcotic-based anesthesia the upper facial and hand muscles are differentially sensitive to commonly used neuromuscular blockers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3193148     DOI: 10.1007/bf01617322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  8 in total

1.  Morphologic studies of motor units in normal human muscles.

Authors:  B FEINSTEIN; B LINDEGARD; E NYMAN; G WOHLFART
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1955

Review 2.  Monitoring of neuromuscular function.

Authors:  H H Ali; J J Savarese
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  The margin of safety of neuromuscular transmission in the muscle of the diaphragm.

Authors:  B E Waud; D R Waud
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  A new instrument for continuous recording of the evoked compound electromyogram in the clinical setting.

Authors:  C Lee; R L Katz; A S Lee; B Glaser
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Computerized monitoring of the EMG and EEG during anesthesia. An evaluation of the anesthesia and brain activity monitor (ABM).

Authors:  H L Edmonds; M Paloheimo
Journal:  Int J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1985

6.  The neuropsychology of facial expression: a review of the neurological and psychological mechanisms for producing facial expressions.

Authors:  W E Rinn
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Variability in assessment of neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  P Stiffel; S R Hameroff; C D Blitt; R C Cork
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Twitch, tetanus and train-of-four as indices of recovery from nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  H H Ali; J J Savarese; P W Lebowitz; F M Ramsey
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 7.892

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of integrated evoked EMG between the hypothenar and facial muscle groups following atracurium and vecuronium administration.

Authors:  M D Sharpe; C A Moote; A M Lam; P H Manninen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade does not alter sensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  T B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-01

3.  Craniofacial electromyogram activation response: another indicator of anesthetic depth.

Authors:  R C Dutton; W D Smith; H L Bennett; S Archer; N T Smith
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Facial muscle activity, Response Entropy, and State Entropy indices during noxious stimuli in propofol-nitrous oxide or propofol-nitrous oxide-remifentanil anaesthesia without neuromuscular block.

Authors:  A J Aho; A Yli-Hankala; L-P Lyytikäinen; V Jäntti
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 9.166

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.