Literature DB >> 2340607

Clinical assessment of the muscular response to tetanic nerve stimulation.

J Y Dupuis1, R Martin, J M Tessonnier, J P Tétrault.   

Abstract

The study was undertaken in order to determine clinical tactile evaluation of tetanic nerve stimulation (50 Hz, 5 sec) as a means of detecting fade and possible residual curarization. Forty-four patients were studied and 128 clinical evaluations by eight different observers were performed at various levels of neuromuscular blockade. Tetanic fade was detected reliably by clinical evaluation only when high degrees of fade (tetanic fade ratio of 0.3 or less) were detected with a force-displacement transducer. We conclude that the clinical tactile assessment of the response to tetanic stimulation is not accurate except at very high degrees of fade and that its usefulness in monitoring neuromuscular recovery is doubtful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2340607     DOI: 10.1007/BF03005614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  19 in total

1.  A PORTABLE PERIPHERAL NERVE-STIMULATOR.

Authors:  H C CHURCHILL-DAVIDSON
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1965 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Voluntary strength and fatigue.

Authors:  P A MERTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1954-03-29       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Tetanic fade and post-tetanic tension in the absence of neuromuscular blocking agents in anesthetized man.

Authors:  A Stanec; J Heyduk; G Stanec; L R Orkin
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1978 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  A nerve stimulator for the continuous monitoring of muscle relaxant action.

Authors:  R L Katz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1965 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 5.  Clinical assessment of neuromuscular transmission.

Authors:  J Viby-Mogensen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Tactile and visual evaluation of the response to train-of-four nerve stimulation.

Authors:  J Viby-Mogensen; N H Jensen; J Engbaek; H Ording; L T Skovgaard; B Chraemmer-Jørgensen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Posttetanic count (PTC): a new method of evaluating an intense nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  J Viby-Mogensen; P Howardy-Hansen; B Chraemmer-Jørgensen; H Ording; J Engbaek; A Nielsen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Neuromuscular sensitivity to tubocurarine. A comparison of 10 parameters.

Authors:  C Lee; A Barnes; R L Katz
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Postoperative neuromuscular function.

Authors:  G H Beemer; P Rozental
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.669

10.  Twitch, tetanus and train-of-four as indices of recovery from nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  H H Ali; J J Savarese; P W Lebowitz; F M Ramsey
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  2 in total

1.  Selective versus non-selective neural stimulation in the monitoring of muscular relaxation during general anesthesia.

Authors:  J Rodiera; R Calabuig; A Gual
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Edrophonium antagonism of vecuronium at varying degrees of fourth twitch recovery.

Authors:  Y M Salib; F Donati; D R Bevan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.063

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.