Literature DB >> 6450448

Acute low-back pain. An objective analysis of conservative therapy.

S W Wiesel, J M Cuckler, F Deluca, F Jones, M S Zeide, R H Rothman.   

Abstract

The roles of bedrest, antiinflammatory medication, and analgesic medication in the treatment of acute back strain were objectively analyzed to determine whether they have a measurable effect on the return of patients to full daily activities as well as on the relief of pain. Two hundred patients were studied prospectively. Each patient had the diagnosis of acute back strain, which was defined as nonradiating low-back pain. The results of the patient's neurologic examination, straight leg raising test, and lumbosacral spine roentgenograms had to be within normal limits for the patient to be included in the study. The results showed that bedrest, as compared with ambulation, will decrease the amount of time lost from work by 50%. Bedrest will also decrease the amount of discomfort by 60%. Analgesic medication, when combined with bedrest, will further decrease the amount of pain incurred, particularly when used in the first three days of the healing process. However, analgesic medication will not allow a more prompt return to work. Antiinflammatory medication, when added to bedrest in the treatment of lumbago, does not provide an advantage over bedrest alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6450448     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198007000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence.

Authors:  Patrick Loisel; Rachelle Buchbinder; Rowland Hazard; Robert Keller; Inger Scheel; Maurits van Tulder; Barbara Webster
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

Review 2.  Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Does 48 hours' bed rest influence the outcome of acute low back pain?

Authors:  M J Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Management of low-back pain in family practice: a critical review.

Authors:  J R Gilbert
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Simple low back pain: rest or active exercise?

Authors:  G Waddell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 6.  Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  B W Koes; R J Scholten; J M Mens; L M Bouter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  Pharmacological management of low back pain.

Authors:  Roger Chou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? Objective assessment of trunk function.

Authors:  M Szpalski; J P Hayez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Recent advances in the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  A Nachemson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  A systematic review of paracetamol for non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Reece A Davies; Christopher G Maher; Mark J Hancock
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.