Literature DB >> 20054944

How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? Objective assessment of trunk function.

M Szpalski1, J P Hayez.   

Abstract

Bed rest is usually considered an efficient treatment for acute low back pain. However, the optimal duration of bed rest is still being discussed. The recommended periods vary from 2 days to 2 weeks. The duration of optimum length is an important topic given the economical and physiological drawbacks of prolonged inactivity. The purpose of this work is to measure objectively the efficacy of two different durations of bed rest through a dynamometric measure of trunk function. Some 51 male patients, students or self-employed, being treated for acute low back pain were randomized into two groups. Group I was prescribed a bed rest period of 3 days and group II, a period of 7 days. We used a multi-axis isoinertial trunk testing dynamometric device (Isostation B200, Isotechnologies, USA). Patients were all assessed on day 1 and also on day 5 for group I or on day 9 for group II. The variables measured in the sagittal plane were isometric torques in flexion and extension, unresisted range of motion, average dynamic torques and average velocities. Patients were also asked to fill in a visual analogue pain scale on both assessment days. The improvement of all performance measures were important and highly significant (P < 0.001) in both groups. The results of the functional testing and the visual analogue pain scale showed no significant differences between the groups. In these relatively young and motivated patients, a duration of bed rest of 3 days resulted in the same objective functional improvement of trunk function and pain rating as a period of 7 days. This shorter duration should be considered as preferable, given the same objective results but important physiological and economical advantages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 20054944     DOI: 10.1007/bf00302139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and treatment of backache.

Authors:  R J Quinet; N M Hadler
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Low-energy laser treatment and exercise for chronic low back pain: double-blind controlled trial.

Authors:  R G Klein; B C Eek
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  The relationship of torque, velocity, and power with constant resistive load during sagittal trunk movement.

Authors:  M Parnianpour; M Nordin; A Sheikhzadeh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  1988 Volvo award in biomechanics. The triaxial coupling of torque generation of trunk muscles during isometric exertions and the effect of fatiguing isoinertial movements on the motor output and movement patterns.

Authors:  M Parnianpour; M Nordin; N Kahanovitz; V Frankel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Low back pain in industry. A position paper.

Authors:  M L Rowe
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1969-04

6.  An isoinertial technique to assess individual lifting capability.

Authors:  K H Kroemer
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  The disuse syndrome.

Authors:  W M Bortz
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1984-11

8.  Conservative therapy for low back pain. Distinguishing useful from useless therapy.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-08-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The intensity of work recovery in low back pain.

Authors:  G B Andersson; H O Svensson; A Odén
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  R A Deyo; A K Diehl; M Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-10-23       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Does Adequate Lumbar Segmental Motion Reflect Recovery Process in Acute Lumbar Disc Herniation?

Authors:  Hyuntae Kim; Ho Joong Jung; Minsun Kim; Seong-Eun Koh; In-Sik Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2019-02-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.