Literature DB >> 21267291

Management of low-back pain in family practice: a critical review.

J R Gilbert.   

Abstract

There is a profusion of both orthodox and unorthodox treatments for low-back pain, many of which have been inadequately evaluated. Conflicting claims exist for nearly all of these treatments. To assess the evidence supporting these commonly used conservative therapies in family practice, a set of methodological criteria for evaluating the validity and usefulness of the results was applied to original articles which described trials of bed rest, exercises, manipulation, drug therapy, advice/education, and other therapies such as traction, corsets and transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TNS). Guidelines for managing acute back pain and acute back pain with sciatica are indicated. Key questions and certain physical signs which suggest a functional overlay in a patient with chronic back pain are also outlined.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 21267291      PMCID: PMC2328172     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  41 in total

1.  The placebo effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Gudni Thorsteinsson; Henry H Stonnington; Keith G Stillwell; Lila R Elveback
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Lumbar disc herniation. A prospective study of prognostic factors including a controlled trial. Part II.

Authors:  H Weber
Journal:  J Oslo City Hosp       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug

3.  Back pain: a randomized clinical trial of rotational manipulation of the trunk.

Authors:  J R Glover; J G Morris; T Khosla
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1974-01

4.  Comparison of carisoprodol, butabarbital, and placebo in treatment of the low back syndrome.

Authors:  T H Hindle
Journal:  Calif Med       Date:  1972-08

5.  Physical therapy on low back pain and sciatica. An attempt at evaluation.

Authors:  A Lidström; M Zachrisson
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

6.  Acute low back pain. Comparison of two conservative treatment approaches.

Authors:  J P Farrell; L T Twomey
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1982-02-20       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  The load on lumbar disks in different positions of the body.

Authors:  A Nachemson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1966 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Low back pain and manipulation. Paraparesis after treatment of low back pain by physical methods.

Authors:  J Hooper
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1973-03-17       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries.

Authors:  G Waddell; E G Kummel; W N Lotto; J D Graham; H Hall; J A McCulloch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Controlled trial of imipramine for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  J Alcoff; E Jones; P Rust; R Newman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study on the Efficacy of the Arthrokinematic Approach-Hakata Method in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Akira Kogure; Kazuhiko Kotani; Shigehiko Katada; Hiroshi Takagi; Masahiro Kamikozuru; Takashi Isaji; Setsuo Hakata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.