Literature DB >> 18797937

A systematic review of paracetamol for non-specific low back pain.

Reece A Davies1, Christopher G Maher, Mark J Hancock.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of paracetamol (acetaminophen) in the treatment of pain and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy of paracetamol in the treatment of pain and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain. A search for randomized controlled trials was conducted using the Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases. Trials were eligible if they were randomized controlled trials comparing paracetamol to no treatment, placebo or another treatment in patients with non-specific low back pain. Two of the authors independently assessed trials for methodological quality on the PEDro Scale and extracted data. Continuous pain and disability data were converted to a common 0-10 scale; ordinal data were dichotomized (e.g., no pain, pain). The data was analyzed using the MIX version 1.61 meta-analysis software. Out of 205 unique articles found in the searches, 7 eligible trials were identified. The trials enrolled a total of 676 participants with 5 investigating acute low back pain, 1 investigating chronic low back pain and 1 investigating both. No trial provided data comparing paracetamol to placebo and only one trial compared paracetamol to no treatment. In general the trials were small (only 1 trial had >25 subjects per group) and of low methodological quality (only 2 had a score above 6 on the quality scale). All but one of the trials provided imprecise estimates of the effects of treatment with confidence intervals spanning clinically important beneficial and also harmful effects of paracetamol. No trial reported a statistically significant difference in favor of paracetamol. There is insufficient evidence to assess the efficacy of paracetamol in patients with low back pain. There is a clear need for large, high quality randomized controlled trials evaluating paracetamol, to provide reliable evidence of paracetamol's effectiveness in patients with low back pain and to establish the validity of the recommendations in clinical guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18797937      PMCID: PMC2583194          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0783-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

Review 1.  How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study.

Authors:  M Egger; P Juni; C Bartlett; F Holenstein; J Sterne
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Christopher G Maher; Catherine Sherrington; Robert D Herbert; Anne M Moseley; Mark Elkins
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2003-08

3.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Electroacupuncture compared with paracetamol for acute low back pain.

Authors:  G I Hackett; D Seddon; D Kaminski
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1988-02-22

5.  Continuous low-level heat wrap therapy provides more efficacy than Ibuprofen and acetaminophen for acute low back pain.

Authors:  Scott F Nadler; Deborah J Steiner; Geetha N Erasala; David A Hengehold; Robert T Hinkle; Mary Beth Goodale; Susan B Abeln; Kurt W Weingand
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The efficacy of amitriptyline and acetaminophen in the management of acute low back pain.

Authors:  D Stein; T Peri; E Edelstein; A Elizur; Y Floman
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.386

7.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

Authors:  K F Schulz; I Chalmers; R J Hayes; D G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Chronic low back pain: a comparison of diflunisal with paracetamol.

Authors:  R F Hickey
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1982-05-12

9.  Overexertional lumbar and thoracic back pain among recruits: a prospective study of risk factors and treatment regimens.

Authors:  C Milgrom; A Finestone; B Lev; M Wiener; Y Floman
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1993-06

10.  Acute low-back pain. An objective analysis of conservative therapy.

Authors:  S W Wiesel; J M Cuckler; F Deluca; F Jones; M S Zeide; R H Rothman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Paracetamol for low back pain.

Authors:  Bruno T Saragiotto; Gustavo C Machado; Manuela L Ferreira; Marina B Pinheiro; Christina Abdel Shaheed; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-07

2.  Usage patterns of paracetamol in France.

Authors:  Mai Duong; Sinem Ezgi Gulmez; Francesco Salvo; Abdelilah Abouelfath; Régis Lassalle; Cécile Droz; Patrick Blin; Nicholas Moore
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Low back pain (chronic).

Authors:  Roger Chou
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-10-08

Review 4.  Pharmacological management of low back pain.

Authors:  Roger Chou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  [Paracetamol. Efficacious and safe for all ages].

Authors:  M Wehling
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  PACE--the first placebo controlled trial of paracetamol for acute low back pain: design of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher M Williams; Jane Latimer; Christopher G Maher; Andrew J McLachlan; Chris W Cooper; Mark J Hancock; Richard O Day; James H McAuley; Chung-Wei Christine Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  Acute Lumbar Back Pain.

Authors:  Hans-Raimund Casser; Susann Seddigh; Michael Rauschmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Participation of pharmacists in clinical trial recruitment for low back pain.

Authors:  Christina Abdel Shaheed; Christopher G Maher; Kylie A Williams; Andrew J McLachlan
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-08-08

Review 9.  Chronic low back pain: pharmacological, interventional and surgical strategies.

Authors:  Bart Morlion
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 10.  Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for spinal pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials.

Authors:  Gustavo C Machado; Chris G Maher; Paulo H Ferreira; Marina B Pinheiro; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Richard O Day; Andrew J McLachlan; Manuela L Ferreira
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.