Literature DB >> 6447764

Recognition of transposed melodies: a key-distance effect in developmental perspective.

J C Bartlett, W J Dowling.   

Abstract

Four experiments examined the possibility of a key-distance effect in a transposition detection task. Subjects heard standard melodies followed by comparison melodies presented in the same key, a musically near key or a musically far key. The task was to recognize comparisons that were exact transpositions of the standards, rejecting nontranspositions. Results suggested a largely invariant key-distance effect with nontransposition comparisons (lures); same- and near-key lures evoked more false alarms than far-key lures. The variables of musical experience, age of subject, and familiarity of melody affected the level of transposition-recognition performance but did not consistently affect the size of the key-distance effect. The results support the psychological reality of key distance and are consistent with both musical and nonmusical-auditory theories of its effects. The key-distance effect was not found with transposition comparisons (targets), a result with implications for the separability of key and interval information in short-term memory for melodies.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6447764     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.6.3.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  32 in total

1.  Some influences of accent structure on melody recognition.

Authors:  M R Jones; J T Ralston
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-01

2.  Tonal strength and melody recognition after long and short delays.

Authors:  W J Dowling
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-10

3.  Neural correlates of pre-attentive processing of pattern deviance in professional musicians.

Authors:  Benedikt Habermeyer; Marcus Herdener; Fabrizio Esposito; Caroline C Hilti; Markus Klarhöfer; Francesco di Salle; Stephan Wetzel; Klaus Scheffler; Katja Cattapan-Ludewig; Erich Seifritz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Memory for musical surface.

Authors:  C L Krumhansl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-07

5.  Do ferrets perceive relative pitch?

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Recognition of transposed melodies: Effects of pitch distance and harmonic distance.

Authors:  Abigail L Kleinsmith; W Trammell Neill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

7.  Exposure effects on music preference and recognition.

Authors:  I Peretz; D Gaudreau; A M Bonnel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-09

8.  Tonal hierarchy representations in auditory imagery.

Authors:  Dominique T Vuvan; Mark A Schmuckler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

9.  The influence of height and key on the perceptual similarity of transposed melodies.

Authors:  R van Egmond; D J Povel; E Maris
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-11

Review 10.  Defining the biological bases of individual differences in musicality.

Authors:  Bruno Gingras; Henkjan Honing; Isabelle Peretz; Laurel J Trainor; Simon E Fisher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.