Literature DB >> 29181781

Recognition of transposed melodies: Effects of pitch distance and harmonic distance.

Abigail L Kleinsmith1, W Trammell Neill2.   

Abstract

People easily recognize a familiar melody in a previously unheard key, but they also retain some key-specific information. Does the recognition of a transposed melody depend on either pitch distance or harmonic distance from the initially learned instances? Previous research has shown a stronger effect of pitch closeness than of harmonic similarity, but did not directly test for an additional effect of the latter variable. In the present experiment, we familiarized participants with a simple eight-note melody in two different keys (C and D) and then tested their ability to discriminate the target melody from foils in other keys. The transpositions included were to the keys of C# (close in pitch height, but harmonically distant), G (more distant in pitch, but harmonically close), and F# (more distant in pitch and harmonically distant). Across participants, the transpositions to F# and G were either higher or lower than the initially trained melodies, so that their average pitch distances from C and D were equated. A signal detection theory analysis confirmed that discriminability (d') was better for targets and foils that were close in pitch distance to the studied exemplars. Harmonic similarity had no effect on discriminability, but it did affect response bias (c), in that harmonic similarity to the studied exemplars increased both hits and false alarms. Thus, both pitch distance and harmonic distance affect the recognition of transposed melodies, but with dissociable effects on discrimination and response bias.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Music cognition; Signal detection theory; Sound recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29181781     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1406-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  Absolute memory for musical pitch: evidence from the production of learned melodies.

Authors:  D J Levitin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-10

2.  The influence of height and key on the perceptual similarity of transposed melodies.

Authors:  R van Egmond; D J Povel; E Maris
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-11

3.  Remembering the melody and timbre, forgetting the key and tempo.

Authors:  E Glenn Schellenberg; Peter Habashi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-10

4.  Memory for surface features of unfamiliar melodies: independent effects of changes in pitch and tempo.

Authors:  E Glenn Schellenberg; Stephanie M Stalinski; Bradley M Marks
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-06

5.  On the genesis of abstract ideas.

Authors:  M I Posner; S W Keele
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-07

6.  Music recognition.

Authors:  D Deutsch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Recognition of transposed melodies: a key-distance effect in developmental perspective.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; W J Dowling
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Good pitch memory is widespread.

Authors:  E Glenn Schellenberg; Sandra E Trehub
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-05

9.  Memory for the absolute pitch of familiar songs.

Authors:  A R Halpern
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.