Literature DB >> 6437542

Reliability of cardiotocography in predicting baby's condition at birth.

P Curzen, J S Bekir, D G McLintock, M Patel.   

Abstract

A prospective study of 6825 labours was undertaken to determine the relation between the Apgar scores of the babies at one minute and the cardiotocograph tracing in labour. The sensitivity of an abnormal tracing was 35.2% for babies who needed intermittent positive pressure ventilation and 20.0% for babies who did not but who had Apgar scores of less than 7. The sensitivity of an abnormal tracing for all babies with an Apgar score of less than 7 was 23.2%. The positive predictive value of an abnormal tracing was 8.7% for babies who needed intermittent positive pressure ventilation and 18.7% for babies who did not but who had an Apgar score of less than 7. The positive predictive value of an abnormal tracing was 27.4% for all babies with an Apgar score of less than 7. The specificity of the tracing was 93.4% for babies with an Apgar score of 7 or over. The relatively high incidence of false positive predictions might be explained on the grounds that abnormalities in the cardiotocograph tracing are a more sensitive indicator of hypoxia than the Apgar score. False negative predictions might have been due to adverse factors other than hypoxia--for example, fetal trauma, compression of the head, infection, and analgesia in labour. These findings suggest that the current overdependence on fetal monitoring by cardiotocography alone should be examined and that other reliable indicators for non-hypoxic fetal distress should be sought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6437542      PMCID: PMC1443593          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.289.6455.1345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  8 in total

1.  Controlled trial of fetal intensive care.

Authors:  P Renou; A Chang; I Anderson; C Wood
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-10-15       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  A D Haverkamp; H E Thompson; J G McFee; C Cetrulo
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-06-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The significance of the changes in the continuous fetal heart rate in the first stage of labour.

Authors:  R W Beard; G M Filshie; C A Knight; G M Roberts
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1971-10

4.  Do Apgar scores indicate asphyxia?

Authors:  G S Sykes; P M Molloy; P Johnson; W Gu; F Ashworth; G M Stirrat; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Has the expression 'fetal distress' outlived its usefulness?

Authors:  P Steer
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1982-09

6.  A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring.

Authors:  A D Haverkamp; M Orleans; S Langendoerfer; J McFee; J Murphy; H E Thompson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-06-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants.

Authors:  G S Sykes; P M Molloy; P Johnson; G M Stirrat; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-10-01

8.  An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. A randomized trial.

Authors:  I M Kelso; R J Parsons; G F Lawrence; S S Arora; D K Edmonds; I D Cooke
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Influence of perinatal asphyxia on neurologic outcome: consequences for family practice accoucheurs.

Authors:  M Klein; J L Reynolds
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  T Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Obstetric distress signals.

Authors:  T Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Admission Cardiotocography: A Predictor of Neonatal Outcome.

Authors:  Vishnu Bhartiya; Richa Sharma; Anand Kumar; Himsweta Srivastava
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-06-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.