Literature DB >> 27651624

Admission Cardiotocography: A Predictor of Neonatal Outcome.

Vishnu Bhartiya1, Richa Sharma1, Anand Kumar2, Himsweta Srivastava1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening for fetal distress is a big challenge for obstetricians. Labor admission test by cardiotocography (CTG) can be utilized to differentiate between mothers, in whom continuous fetal monitoring is needed and those who can be managed by intermittent auscultation. Admission CTG is commonly used screening test which aims to identify on admission to the delivery unit the fetus at increased risk of intrapartum hypoxia. We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of CTG in low- and high-risk women.
METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted on 200 low-risk and high-risk antenatal women, beyond 32-week gestation with live pregnancy in labor and admitted in labor ward.
RESULTS: Correlation of labor admission test with meconium in low risk and high risk was found statistically significant (p = 0.0010 and p = 0.000046, respectively). Correlation of labor admission test with low Apgar score, NICU admission and mortality was found statistically insignificant in low-risk and high-risk groups.
CONCLUSION: Admission CTG does not benefit the neonatal outcome in normal- or low-risk women and rather results in increased obstetric intervention. Thus, it is not beneficial as a screening test to detect intrapartum fetal distress in normal- or low-risk women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Admission cardiotocography; Perinatal outcome; Screening test

Year:  2016        PMID: 27651624      PMCID: PMC5016479          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-016-0912-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  9 in total

1.  Admission cardiotocography: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lawrence Impey; Margaret Reynolds; Kathryn MacQuillan; Simon Gates; John Murphy; Orla Sheil
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Value of a screening fetal heart rate tracing in the latent phase of labor.

Authors:  J Ducey; E Guzman; H Schulman; G Farmakedis; I Karmin
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 0.142

3.  The accuracy of auscultatory detection of fetal cardiac decelerations: a computer simulation.

Authors:  B S Schifrin; J Amsel; G Burdorf
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Admission Cardiotocography Screening of High Risk Obstetric Patients.

Authors:  G S Sandhu; R Raju; T K Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

5.  The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  A D Haverkamp; H E Thompson; J G McFee; C Cetrulo
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-06-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labour in low risk obstetric population.

Authors:  G Mires; F Williams; P Howie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-16

7.  Reliability of cardiotocography in predicting baby's condition at birth.

Authors:  P Curzen; J S Bekir; D G McLintock; M Patel
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-11-17

8.  Admission test: a screening test for fetal distress in labor.

Authors:  I Ingemarsson; S Arulkumaran; E Ingemarsson; R L Tambyraja; S S Ratnam
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring--continuous electronic versus intermittent Doppler--a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  K Mahomed; R Nyoni; T Mlambo; E Jacobus; J Kasule
Journal:  Cent Afr J Med       Date:  1992-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.