Literature DB >> 6371155

Latex-agglutination test for rubella antibody: validity of positive results assessed by response to immunization and comparison with other tests.

G A Storch, N Myers.   

Abstract

A commercial-latex agglutination (LA) assay ( Rubascan , Hynson , Westcott and Dunning, Baltimore, Md) performed on undiluted serum may be more sensitive than is the standard hemagglutination-inhibition assay for the detection of rubella antibody. To investigate whether a positive result of an LA test on undiluted serum was correlated with rubella immunity, we identified 29 persons whose sera produced negative results when initially tested by LA at a 1:10 dilution; 15 of these sera produced positive results and 14 produced negative results when retested undiluted. The immune status of each person for rubella was determined with a test for IgM rubella antibody on serum samples obtained three to five weeks after rubella immunization. None of the 15 persons whose preimmunization sera produced positive results by LA when tested undiluted developed IgM rubella antibody, as compared with 10 of the 14 persons whose preimmunization sera produced negative results (P less than 0.001). Data from this study support the specificity of a positive result of an LA test performed on undiluted serum, but a 1:5 dilution may be optimal for determination of rubella immune status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6371155     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/149.3.459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  8 in total

1.  Increasing rubella seronegativity despite a compulsory school law.

Authors:  T R Schum; D B Nelson; M A Duma; G V Sedmak
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Evaluation of a new latex test and a new enzyme immunoassay for determination of rubella immunity.

Authors:  A E Simor; R Chua; D E Low
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Differences in antibody responses with rapid agglutination tests for the detection of rubella antibodies.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D J DeLong; J B Mahony; S Castriciano
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of a latex agglutination test for screening antibodies to rubella virus.

Authors:  P León; F de Ory; C Domingo; J A López; J M Echevarría
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Comparison of a new, rapid enzyme immunoassay with a latex agglutination test for qualitative detection of rubella antibodies.

Authors:  M J Ferraro; W M Kallas; K P Welch; A Y Lau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of a simple latex agglutination test with hemolysis-in-gel, hemagglutination inhibition, and radioimmunoassay for detection of rubella virus antibodies.

Authors:  P Väänänen; V M Häivä; P Koskela; O Meurman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  How to determine protective immunity in the post-vaccine era.

Authors:  Carmen L Charlton; Florence Y Lai; Douglas C Dover
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Comparison of five methods for the determination of rubella immunity.

Authors:  R L Sautter; A E Crist; L M Johnson; W D Lebar
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.