Literature DB >> 6355446

Comparative study of gingival retraction methods.

R Azzi, T F Tsao, F A Carranza, E B Kenney.   

Abstract

The effects of electrosurgery, retraction cord, and the rotary gingival curettage technique were tested clinically and histologically in dogs. Postoperative periods analyzed ranged from 6 hours to 14 days. All methods induced some kind of minor damage. Recession of clinical magnitude was induced only by rotary gingival curettage. Apical migration of the junctional epithelium was not seen.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1983        PMID： 6355446     DOI： 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90581-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN： 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of gingival displacement methods in terms of periodontal health at crown restorations produced by digital scan: 1-year clinical follow-up.

Authors:  Beyza Ünalan Değirmenci; Beyza Karadağ Naldemir; Alperen Değirmenci
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Mini-invasive impression techniques in fixed prothesis: an alternative to traditional procedures.

Authors:  M Bonino; G DE Vico; D Spinelli; I Conti; L Ottria; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2010-11-29

3.  Clinical evaluation of three new gingival retraction systems: a research report.

Authors:  Ankit Gupta; D R Prithviraj; Deepti Gupta; D P Shruti
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-07-08

4.  Evaluation of alpha-adrenomimetic agents for gingival retraction: A randomized crossover clinical trial.

Authors:  Neha Mehra; Ajita Rathi; Roshni Sharma; Mamta Kaushik; Tanushree Sood
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2020-08-20

5.  Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Gingival Retraction using Polyvinyl Acetate Strips and Conventional Retraction Cord - An in Vivo Study.

Authors:  M Shivasakthy; Syed Asharaf Ali
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-09-16

6.  Comparative evaluation of the amount of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction systems: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Jignesh Chaudhari; Paranjay Prajapati; Jayanti Patel; Rajesh Sethuraman; Y G Naveen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

7.  Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.

Authors:  Vijeta Gajbhiye; Rajlakshmi Banerjee; Priti Jaiswal; Anuj Chandak; Usha Radke
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

8.  Comparative clinical efficacy evaluation of three gingival displacement systems.

Authors:  Kirti Jajoo Shrivastava; Anjali Bhoyar; Surendra Agarwal; Saurabh Shrivastava; Swapnil Parlani; Varsha Murthy
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2015-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.