Literature DB >> 24298531

Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Gingival Retraction using Polyvinyl Acetate Strips and Conventional Retraction Cord - An in Vivo Study.

M Shivasakthy1, Syed Asharaf Ali.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A new material is proposed in dentistry in the form of strips for producing gingival retraction. The clinical efficacy of the material remains untested. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This study aimed to determine whether the polyvinyl acetate strips are able to effectively displace the gingival tissues in comparison with the conventional retraction cord.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Complete metal ceramic preparation with supra-gingival margin was performed in fourteen maxillary incisors and gingival retraction was done using Merocel strips and conventional retraction cords alternatively in 2 weeks time interval. The amount of displacement was compared using a digital vernier caliper of 0.01mm accuracy. RESULTS were analyzed statistically using Paired students t-test.
RESULTS: The statistical analysis of the data revealed that both the conventional retraction cord and the Merocel strip produce significant retraction. Among both the materials, Merocel proved to be significantly more effective.
CONCLUSION: Merocel strip produces more gingival displacement than the conventional retraction cord.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gingival retraction; Polyvinyl acetate strips; Retraction cord

Year:  2013        PMID: 24298531      PMCID: PMC3843446          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6980.3526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  8 in total

1.  Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords.

Authors:  A Jokstad
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Tissue management with a new gingival retraction material: a preliminary clinical report.

Authors:  M Ferrari; M C Cagidiaco; C Ercoli
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Efficacy of two gingival retraction systems on lateral gingival displacement: A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Purwar Anupam; N Namratha; Shetty Vibha; G N Anandakrishna; Khanna Shally; Amit Singh
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2013-07-03

Review 4.  Tissue displacement methods in fixed prosthodontics.

Authors:  B W Benson; T J Bomberg; R A Hatch; W Hoffman
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Clinical effectiveness of mechanical-chemical tissue displacement methods.

Authors:  D J Weir; B H Williams
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Gingival tissue response to rotary curettage.

Authors:  F W Kamansky; T R Tempel; A C Post
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Effect of retraction materials on gingival health: A histopathological study.

Authors:  Sushma Phatale; P P Marawar; Girish Byakod; Sanjay B Lagdive; Jitendra V Kalburge
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2010-01

8.  Comparative study of gingival retraction methods.

Authors:  R Azzi; T F Tsao; F A Carranza; E B Kenney
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.426

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Quick, painless, and atraumatic gingival retraction: An overview of advanced materials.

Authors:  M Aarti Rajambigai; S Ramesh Raja; S I Joephin Soundar; M Kandasamy
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2016-10

2.  Comparative Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Four Different Gingival Retraction Systems: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Rahul Madaan; Jyoti Paliwal; Vineet Sharma; Kamal K Meena; Ashish Dadarwal; Roshni Kumar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-07

3.  Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Meenakshi Thimmappa; Mehak Bhatia; Prakash Somani; D R V Kumar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

4.  Gingival Displacement in the Vertical and Horizontal Dimension under the Condition of Mild Gingivitis-A Randomized Clinical Study.

Authors:  Katharina Kuhn; David Zügel; Victor-Sebastian A Korbay; Thomas Papas; Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Ralph G Luthardt; Jens Dreyhaupt; Heike Rudolph
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.