Literature DB >> 24431705

Clinical evaluation of three new gingival retraction systems: a research report.

Ankit Gupta1, D R Prithviraj1, Deepti Gupta1, D P Shruti1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of 3 new gingival retraction systems; Stay-put, Magic foam cord and expasyl, on the basis of their relative ease of handling, time taken for placement, hemorrhage control and the amount of gingival retraction. Thirty subjects were selected requiring fixed prosthesis. The 3 gingival retraction systems were used on the prepared abutments randomly. The time taken for placement of each retraction system was recorded. The vertical gingival retraction was measured before and after retraction using flexible measuring strip with 0.5 mm grading. The horizontal retraction was measured on polyether impressions made before the retraction and after retraction. Based on the results, magic foam cord retraction system can be considered more effective gingival retraction system among the three retraction systems used in the study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Expasyl; Gingival retraction; Magic foam cord; Stay-put

Year:  2012        PMID: 24431705      PMCID: PMC3602524          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0140-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  13 in total

1.  An alternative way to use gingival retraction paste.

Authors:  Marsha Smeltzer
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 2.  Current concepts in gingival displacement.

Authors:  Terry E Donovan; Winston W L Chee
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04

3.  Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords.

Authors:  A Jokstad
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Gingival inflammatory response induced by chemical retraction agents in beagle dogs.

Authors:  Igor Kopac; Erika Cvetko; Ljubo Marion
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

5.  Copper-band gingival retraction to produce void-free crown and bridge impressions.

Authors:  H Darby; L H Darby
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  A longitudinal study into the depth of the clinical gingival sulcus of human canine teeth during and after eruption.

Authors:  R G Smith
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.419

7.  Clinical effectiveness of mechanical-chemical tissue displacement methods.

Authors:  D J Weir; B H Williams
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 8.  Systemic effects of epinephrine-impregnated retraction cord in fixed partial denture prosthodontics.

Authors:  W T Buchanan; K E Thayer
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.

Authors:  Pantira Aimjirakul; Takayuki Masuda; Hidekazu Takahashi; Hiroyuki Miura
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

10.  Evaluation of new gingival retraction agents.

Authors:  W H Bowles; S J Tardy; A Vahadi
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 6.116

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Gingival Displacement Using Three Recent Gingival Retraction Systems - In vivo Study.

Authors:  Siddique Mohammed Qureshi; Nayana Shriram Anasane; Dilip Kakade
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2020-07-13

Review 2.  Gingival Retraction Methods for Fabrication of Fixed Partial Denture: Literature Review.

Authors:  Safari S; Vossoghi Sheshkalani Ma; Vossoghi Sheshkalani Mi; Hoseini Ghavam F; Hamedi M
Journal:  J Dent Biomater       Date:  2016-06

3.  Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.

Authors:  Vijeta Gajbhiye; Rajlakshmi Banerjee; Priti Jaiswal; Anuj Chandak; Usha Radke
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

4.  A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Gingival Retraction Using Polyvinyl Siloxane Foam Retraction System, Vinyl Polysiloxane Paste Retraction System, and Copper Wire Reinforced Retraction Cord in Endodontically Treated Teeth: An in vivo Study.

Authors:  Sonal Mehta; Hemali Virani; Sarfaraz Memon; Narendra Nirmal
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

5.  Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Meenakshi Thimmappa; Mehak Bhatia; Prakash Somani; D R V Kumar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

6.  Gingival Displacement in the Vertical and Horizontal Dimension under the Condition of Mild Gingivitis-A Randomized Clinical Study.

Authors:  Katharina Kuhn; David Zügel; Victor-Sebastian A Korbay; Thomas Papas; Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Ralph G Luthardt; Jens Dreyhaupt; Heike Rudolph
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.