Literature DB >> 6352195

Cardiac output by thermodilution technique. Effect of injectate's volume and temperature on accuracy and reproducibility in the critically Ill patient.

U Elkayam, R Berkley, S Azen, L Weber, B Geva, W L Henry.   

Abstract

We compared determinations of cardiac output using various combinations of injectate volumes and temperatures to results obtained with 10 ml of iced (0 degrees C) injectate (standard technique) in 33 critically ill patients. The use of a 10-ml injectate at room temperature resulted in comparable reproducibility (12.7 vs 10.8 percent; not significant) and a small and nonsignificant error (-0.013 +/- 0.543 L/min). Five milliliters at room temperature resulted in markedly decreased reproducibility (17.9 vs 8.9 percent; p less than 0.05); however, the error associated with the technique was still not significant (0.136 +/- 0.829 L/min). When a 5-ml injectate at 0 degrees C was used, a reproducibility comparable to that of 10 ml at 0 degrees C was obtained (12.3 vs 7.5 percent; not significant). The results underestimated values obtained with 10 ml at 0 degrees C (-0.360 +/- 0.857 L/minute); however, the difference did not reach statistical significance. The use of 3 ml at 0 degrees C was associated with a substantial increase in variability, with a coefficient of variation of 32.0 percent (10.4 percent for 10 ml of iced injectate; p less than 0.01); however, the differences between the average value of cardiac output obtained with this technique and the standard technique were only minimal (error, -0.063 +/- 0.455; not significant). We reached the following conclusions: (1) the use of 10 ml at room temperature and 5 ml at 0 degrees C as the indicator for thermodilution determinations of cardiac output results in small and insignificant differences in reproducibility and accuracy from the standard technique; (2) five milliliters at room temperature and 3 ml at 0 degrees C are associated with markedly decreased reproducibility; however, the error in values for cardiac output obtained with these techniques is not statistically significant; and (3) the ability to use injectate at room temperature and in small volume should substantially simplify the technique, lowering its cost, and should prevent volume overloading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6352195     DOI: 10.1378/chest.84.4.418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  14 in total

1.  Central venous blood temperature fluctuations and thermodilution signal processing in dogs.

Authors:  R W Johnson; R A Normann
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring.

Authors:  Yatin Mehta; Dheeraj Arora
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-26

3.  Signal processing strategies for enhancement of signal-to-noise ratio of thermodilution measurements.

Authors:  R W Johnson; R A Normann
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Method of assessing the reproducibility of blood flow measurement: factors influencing the performance of thermodilution cardiac output computers.

Authors:  J D Mackenzie; N E Haites; J M Rawles
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-01

Review 5.  The thermodilution method for the clinical assessment of cardiac output.

Authors:  J R Jansen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Intensive care.

Authors:  S Sinclair; M Singer
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  A faulty lumen resulting in erroneous thermodilution cardiac output measurement.

Authors:  T Latson; G Maruschak
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1985-07

8.  Thermodilution vs Estimated Fick Cardiac Output Measurement in Clinical Practice: An Analysis of Mortality From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (VA CART) Program and Vanderbilt University.

Authors:  Alexander R Opotowsky; Edward Hess; Bradley A Maron; Evan L Brittain; Anna E Barón; Thomas M Maddox; Laith I Alshawabkeh; Bradley M Wertheim; Meng Xu; Tufik R Assad; Jonathan D Rich; Gaurav Choudhary; Ryan J Tedford
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

9.  Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: whole-body impedance cardiography in simultaneous comparison with thermodilution and direct oxygen Fick methods.

Authors:  T Kööbi; S Kaukinen; T Ahola; V M Turjanmaa
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution.

Authors:  T Nishikawa; S Dohi
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.