Literature DB >> 6311875

False-susceptible results from the MS-2 system used for testing resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa against two third-generation cephalosporins, moxalactam and cefotaxime.

L L Stone, D L Jungkind.   

Abstract

The MS-2 system (Abbott Laboratories) was used for cefotaxime and moxalactam susceptibility testing of 111 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from our burn treatment center. The frequency of very major errors was 52% for moxalactam and 32% for cefotaxime for all isolates requiring a minimal inhibitory concentration of greater than or equal to 64 micrograms/ml. For isolates requiring a minimal inhibitory concentration of 64 micrograms/ml, the very major errors were 78% for moxalactam and 57% for cefotaxime. Testing of an additional 44 isolates collected from another hospital confirmed that these results were not unique to nosocomial strains from within the burn center. The ratio of errors did not change when MS-2 results were compared with disk diffusion results. Colony count testing done on cuvettes which produced false-susceptible results indicated that little numerical change occurred during the 5- to 6-h test cycle, whereas microscopy of cuvette contents revealed metabolically active filamentous bacilli. The high frequency of false-susceptible results indicated that the MS-2 should not be used for testing clinical P. aeruginosa isolates for resistance to the two third-generation cephalosporins currently available for the MS-2. A comparison of the disk diffusion results indicated that neither moxalactam nor cefotaxime could be reliably used for predictive, class-concept testing of P. aeruginosa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6311875      PMCID: PMC270811          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.18.2.389-394.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

1.  Comparative in-vitro activity of moxalactam and cefotaxime against isolates from blood culture.

Authors:  C H Ramirez-Ronda; M Nevarez; S Saavedra; R H Bermudez
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Regrowth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other bacteria after the bactericidal action of carbenicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  M N Gwynn; T L Webb; G N Rolinson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Comparative antipseudomonal activity of some newer beta-lactam agents.

Authors:  D Greenwood; A Eley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Abbott MS-2 automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; J P Anhalt; J A Washington; L R McCarthy; F D Schoenknecht; J C Sherris; H J Spencer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparative activities of the oxa-beta-lactam LY127935, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, cefamandole, and ticarcillin against multiply resistant gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  W H Hall; B J Opfer; D N Gerding
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Reliability of the MS-2 system in detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J M Boyce; R L White; M C Bonner; W R Lockwood
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  In vitro studies with cefotaxime: disk diffusion susceptibility tests.

Authors:  S Shadomy; E L Chan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Tentative interpretive standards for disk susceptibility tests with moxalactam (LY127935).

Authors:  A L Barry; C Thornsberry; R N Jones; E H Gerlach
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  In vitro activity of furazlocillin (Bay k 4999) compared with those of mezlocillin, piperacillin, and standard beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  T D Gootz; C C Sanders; W E Sanders
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Reliability of disc diffusion susceptibility testing.

Authors:  P R Murray; J R Zeitinger; D J Krogstad
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1982 May-Jun
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Resistance to third generation cephalosporins: the current situation.

Authors:  J C Pechère
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Attempted reduction of Abbott MS-2 false-susceptible errors for cefotaxime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa by medium modification.

Authors:  D W Lander; D L Jungkind; L L Stone
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Correlation between growth curve and killing curve of Escherichia coli after a brief exposure to suprainhibitory concentrations of ampicillin and piperacillin.

Authors:  E Yourassowsky; M P Van der Linden; M J Lismont; F Crokaert; Y Glupczynski
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Clinical importance of inducible beta-lactamases in gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  C C Sanders; W E Sanders
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  A "Culture" Shift: Broad Bacterial Detection, Identification, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Directly from Whole Blood.

Authors:  Nadya Andini; Anne Hu; Luming Zhou; Steven Cogill; Tza-Huei Wang; Carl T Wittwer; Samuel Yang
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Evaluation of the Cobas Bact automated system for susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis to azlocillin, mezlocillin, and ciprofloxacin compared to NCCLS and DIN standards.

Authors:  W Heizmann; H Werner; F Heilmann
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Addition of NaCl to MS-2 system clinical cuvettes for combined salt tolerance and susceptibility testing for group D streptococci.

Authors:  E G Nice; L L Stone; J J Fenton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.