Literature DB >> 6807933

Reliability of disc diffusion susceptibility testing.

P R Murray, J R Zeitinger, D J Krogstad.   

Abstract

We retested 2,181 bacteria-antibiotic combinations with the Kirby-Bauer disc-diffusion technique and found interpretive changes with 120 (5.5%). Most changes (101 of 120) were single steps (i.e. from R to I, I to R or S, or S to I). Of the 19 remaining, 10 of them were from R to S and nine from S to R. These changes were significantly more frequent for combinations with zone diameters clustered near interpretive breakpoints (within 2mm) than for other combinations, and there was a linear relationship between decreased reproducibility and increased clustering near interpretive breakpoints. Based on an analysis of all susceptibility testing results performed in 1978, combinations most commonly clustered near interpretive breakpoints included: Ampicillin with Klebsiella pneumoniae; erythromycin with enterococci; chloramphenicol with Serratia marcescens; gentamicin with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterocci; and tetracycline with Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, and K. pneumoniae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6807933     DOI: 10.1017/s0195941700056150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control        ISSN: 0195-9417


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of BIOGRAM and commercial microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test systems.

Authors:  R L Sautter; G A Denys
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Antibiotic resistance of Vibrio anguillarum, in relation to serovar and plasmid contents.

Authors:  K Pedersen; T Tiainen; J L Larsen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.695

3.  Evaluation of Mueller-Hinton agar for disk diffusion susceptibility tests.

Authors:  P R Murray; J R Zeitinger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the BIOGRAM antimicrobial susceptibility test system.

Authors:  R F D'Amato; L Hochstein; J R Vernaleo; D J Cleri; A A Wallman; M S Gradus; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the BIOMIC video reader system for determining interpretive categories of isolates on the basis of disk diffusion susceptibility results.

Authors:  E K Korgenski; J A Daly
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  False-susceptible results from the MS-2 system used for testing resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa against two third-generation cephalosporins, moxalactam and cefotaxime.

Authors:  L L Stone; D L Jungkind
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Latent class comparison of test accuracy when evaluating antimicrobial susceptibility using disk diffusion and broth microdilution to test Escherichia coli and Mannheimia haemolytica isolates recovered from beef feedlot cattle.

Authors:  K M Benedict; S P Gow; R J Reid-Smith; C W Booker; T A McAllister; P S Morley
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.434

8.  Methodological comparisons for antimicrobial resistance surveillance in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Katharine M Benedict; Sheryl P Gow; Sylvia Checkley; Calvin W Booker; Tim A McAllister; Paul S Morley
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 2.741

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.