Literature DB >> 6298858

Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses.

A P Harper, E Kelly-Fry, J S Noe, J R Bies, V P Jackson.   

Abstract

Ultrasound image characteristics and radiographic features of 31 benign and 41 malignant breast masses were cross-tabulated and analyzed to determine the ultrasound image characteristics most useful for diagnosis and the frequency with which some imaging features occurred. The most common malignant mass (the ductal carcinoma) exhibited a jagged wall (88%), homogeneous internal echoes (12%), nonhomogeneous internal echoes (70%), internal echoes not discernible due to attenuation effects (18%), and attenuation shadowing (97%). In contrast, the fibroadenoma (the most common benign mass in this study), exhibited smooth walls (94%), homogeneous internal echoes (89%), and no demonstrable posterior shadowing (67%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6298858     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.146.3.6298858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

Review 1.  The use of ultrasound in benign breast disorders.

Authors:  P B Guyer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Sonographic evaluation of breast nodules: comparison of conventional, real-time compound, and pulse-inversion harmonic images.

Authors:  Bo Kyoung Seo; Yu Whan Oh; Hyung Rae Kim; Hong Weon Kim; Chang Ho Kang; Nam Joon Lee; Jung Hyuk Kim; Bum Jin Park; Kyu Ran Cho; June Young Lee; Ki Yeoul Lee; Jeoung Won Bae
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Differentiation between Phyllodes Tumors and Fibroadenomas Based on Mammographic Sonographic and MRI Features.

Authors:  Lale Duman; Naciye S Gezer; Pınar Balcı; Canan Altay; Işıl Başara; Merih G Durak; Ali I Sevinç
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  The Impact of Dense Breasts on the Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: A Review and Options for Supplemental Screening.

Authors:  Paula B Gordon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Breast cancer angiogenesis: a quantitative morphologic and Doppler imaging study.

Authors:  W J Lee; J S Chu; S J Houng; M F Chung; S M Wang; K M Chen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Breast cancer vascularity: color Doppler sonography and histopathology study.

Authors:  W J Lee; J S Chu; C S Huang; M F Chang; K J Chang; K M Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  The accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast disease.

Authors:  J A Smallwood; P Guyer; K Dewbury; S Mengatti; A Herbert; G T Royle; I Taylor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer.

Authors:  L E Duijm; G L Guit; J O Zaat; A R Koomen; D Willebrand
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Variability in Observer Performance Between Faculty Members and Residents Using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-Ultrasound, Fifth Edition (2013).

Authors:  Youn Joo Lee; So Young Choi; Kyu Sun Kim; Po Song Yang
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 0.212

10.  Use of ultrasound localization to improve results of fine needle aspiration cytology of breast masses.

Authors:  J J Patel; P C Gartell; P B Guyer; A Herbert; I Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 18.000

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.