Literature DB >> 7543800

Breast cancer angiogenesis: a quantitative morphologic and Doppler imaging study.

W J Lee1, J S Chu, S J Houng, M F Chung, S M Wang, K M Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumor growth and metastases require the development of new vessels (angiogenesis). Angiogenesis, assessed by microvessel count using immunocytochemical stain of endothelial cells, has been shown to predict metastases and correlate with early death. Recently developed color Doppler mapping can detect the "tumor flow signals" in breast cancer and help to distinguish it from benign lesions. The question is, does this tumor vascularization assessed by color Doppler mapping correlate with the angiogenesis assessed by immunocytochemistry?
METHODS: Eighty-four patients admitted for breast surgery were studied. The final diagnosis was made by pathology for 52 malignancies and 32 benign lesions. The color Doppler mapping of the breast lesion was made preoperatively. The following parameters were assessed: (a) vessel location (peripheral or central); (b) density of color Doppler signals; and (c) maximum systolic velocity. Tumor angiogenesis was assessed by microvessel count under light microscopy using the platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule antibodies (CD31) method. The correlation between maximum velocity and microvessel count of breast cancer was examined. The clinical significance of maximum flow velocity of breast cancer with various clinicopathologic factors was assessed.
RESULTS: Color signals were detected in 48 cases of 52 malignancies (92%). All tumors demonstrated signals at the periphery of the lesion but in only 13 (27%) were the signals detected within the tumor. Color signals were scored as + + or + + + in 44 (92%) patients. Pulsed wave blood flow was shown in all these 48 tumors, with maximum velocities varying from 4 to 36 cm/s. Among the 32 benign lesions, color signals were detected in 10 (31%) and all were peripheral and scored subjectively as +. Evaluation of these color Doppler mapping parameters shows no significant correlation with microvessel counts using CD31 monoclonal antibodies. However, there was a positive association (p < 0.05) between nodal metastases and higher tumor flow velocity in T1 (< 2 cm) breast tumors but not in larger tumors.
CONCLUSION: Although the color Doppler mapping has been shown to be useful in distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions, the intensity of signal and velocity of flow had no correlation with the extent of angiogenesis of breast cancer. The presence of high-flow tumor signal in early breast carcinoma is significantly associated with the presence of axillary lymph node metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7543800     DOI: 10.1007/bf02307031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  18 in total

1.  Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings.

Authors:  D D Adler; P L Carson; J M Rubin; D Quinn-Reid
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Breast carcinoma detection by ultrasonic Doppler signals.

Authors:  D N White; P R Cledgett
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent?

Authors:  J Folkman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-01-03       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Quantitative relationships of intravascular tumor cells, tumor vessels, and pulmonary metastases following tumor implantation.

Authors:  L A Liotta; J Kleinerman; G M Saidel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Breast lesions: differential diagnosis using digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  A C Watt; L V Ackerman; J P Windham; P C Shetty; M W Burke; M J Flynn; C Grodinsky; G Fine; S J Wilderman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses.

Authors:  A P Harper; E Kelly-Fry; J S Noe; J R Bies; V P Jackson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Ultrasound analysis of 104 primary breast carcinomas classified according to histopathologic type.

Authors:  C Cole-Beuglet; R Z Soriano; A B Kurtz; B B Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Breast neoplasms: duplex sonographic imaging as an adjunct in diagnosis.

Authors:  S G Schoenberger; C M Sutherland; A E Robinson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Duplex sonography of mammary tumors: a prospective study of 75 patients.

Authors:  W Dock
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Angiogenesis, assessed by platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule antibodies, as indicator of node metastases and survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  E R Horak; R Leek; N Klenk; S LeJeune; K Smith; N Stuart; M Greenall; K Stepniewska; A L Harris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Markers of tumor angiogenesis: clinical applications in prognosis and anti-angiogenic therapy.

Authors:  S B Fox; A L Harris
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Thymidine phosphorylase activity and prodrug effects in a three-dimensional model of angiogenesis: implications for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D P Stevenson; W P Collins; F Farzaneh; K Hata; K Miyazaki
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Reply to "Ground Glass Opacity (GGO) Predicts Improved Survival of Pathologic Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients" by Guowei Che et al.

Authors:  Shunsuke Shigefuku
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  A Prospective Study on the Value of Ultrasound Microflow Assessment to Distinguish Malignant from Benign Solid Breast Masses: Association between Ultrasound Parameters and Histologic Microvessel Densities.

Authors:  Ah Young Park; Myoungae Kwon; Ok Hee Woo; Kyu Ran Cho; Eun Kyung Park; Sang Hoon Cha; Sung Eun Song; Ju Han Lee; JaeHyung Cha; Gil Soo Son; Bo Kyoung Seo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.