Literature DB >> 3511831

The accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast disease.

J A Smallwood, P Guyer, K Dewbury, S Mengatti, A Herbert, G T Royle, I Taylor.   

Abstract

The accuracy of breast ultrasound using all purpose static beta-scanning equipment has been compared with mammography. Ultrasound was found to be both more sensitive (93%:82%) and specific (95%:89%) in a large retrospective series of 1000 patients undergoing investigation for symptomatic breast disease. In a smaller prospective and consecutive series of 142 patients undergoing surgery where histological proof was obtained ultrasound was also found to be more sensitive (91%:81%) and specific (81%:69%). In both studies, the greater accuracy of ultrasound was attributed to its ability to diagnose lesions hidden in X-ray dense breasts and where mammography had revealed featureless asymmetical densities of uncertain nature. In these instances ultrasound may have a significant role to play as an adjunct to mammography in the preoperative assessment of breast lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3511831      PMCID: PMC2498197     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  16 in total

1.  Use of high-frequency ultrasonic waves for detecting changes of texture in living tissues.

Authors:  J J WILD; D NEAL
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1951-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Differential diagnosis of breast tumors. The sensitivity graded method ultrasonotomography and clinical evaluation of its diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  T Kobayashi; O Takatani; N Hattori; K Kimura
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Ultrasound of the breast in the symptomatic and X-ray dense breast.

Authors:  P B Guyer; K C Dewbury
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Aspiration cytology in the preoperative management of breast cancer.

Authors:  T I Gardecki; B M Hogbin; D H Melcher; R S Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Combined mammographic-sonographic evaluation of breast masses.

Authors:  H S Teixidor; E Kazam
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Palpable breast masses: evaluation by high frequency, hand-held real-time sonography and xeromammography. Work in progress.

Authors:  A C Fleischer; C A Muhletaler; V H Reynolds; J E Machin; G A Thieme; A L Bundy; A C Winfield; A E James
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  False-negative mammograms delay diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  P E Burns
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Breast cancer detection with sonography and mammography: comparison using state-of-the-art equipment.

Authors:  E A Sickles; R A Filly; P W Callen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Fine needle aspiration cytology, in relationships to clinical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of a solid breast mass.

Authors:  J M Dixon; T J Anderson; J Lamb; S J Nixon; A P Forrest
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  The prognosis and possible cause of severe primary lymphoedema.

Authors:  J H Wolfe
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ultrasound in the diagnosis of symptomatic breast disease.

Authors:  J D Church
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  The use of ultrasound in benign breast disorders.

Authors:  P B Guyer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Sonographic evaluation of breast nodules: comparison of conventional, real-time compound, and pulse-inversion harmonic images.

Authors:  Bo Kyoung Seo; Yu Whan Oh; Hyung Rae Kim; Hong Weon Kim; Chang Ho Kang; Nam Joon Lee; Jung Hyuk Kim; Bum Jin Park; Kyu Ran Cho; June Young Lee; Ki Yeoul Lee; Jeoung Won Bae
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  How accurate is ultrasound in evaluating palpable breast masses?

Authors:  Mubuuke Aloysius Gonzaga
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2010-09-02

5.  X-ray and ultrasound localization of non-palpable breast lesions and difficulties in management.

Authors:  J J Tate; G T Royle; P McDonald; P B Guyer; I Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 18.000

6.  Use of ultrasound localization to improve results of fine needle aspiration cytology of breast masses.

Authors:  J J Patel; P C Gartell; P B Guyer; A Herbert; I Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 18.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.