Literature DB >> 6265257

Neuronal discrimination of natural and synthetic vowels in field L of trained mynah birds.

G Langner, D Bonke, H Scheich.   

Abstract

The discrimination of single neurons for vowels and vowel components was analyzed in the telencephalic field L which is a layered and tonotopically organized primary auditory projection area in the bird's neostriatum. Among 250 units, 132 (53%) were responsive to at least one out of nine vowels from one German speaker. The distribution of responsiveness to n (one to nine) vowels showed that a maximum of 33 out of the 132 neurons preferred n = one vowel. The mechanisms of vowel selectivity were analyzed with five synthetic vowels composed of two formants F1 and F2 which could be presented separately. Most of the selective units also responded to F1 or F2 of the preferred vowel alone. The suppression of the vowels could be explained by formants which fell into inhibitory ranges of that unit, independently demonstrated by the pure tone response. Other units had several excitatory bands which coincided with the formants of the preferred vowel. In some cases a certain amplitude ratio of F1 versus F2 gave the strongest response. Several qualitative models of excitatory-inhibitory interaction of inputs to field L neurons are presented which explain the described selectivities. It is interesting that the distribution of vowel-selective units relates to the most superficial and most basal layer of field L where units selective for species-specific calls have previously been located in a gallinaceous bird.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6265257     DOI: 10.1007/bf00238805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: discrimination of sustained /a/ and /i/.

Authors:  C K Burdick; J D Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Connectivity of the auditory forebrain nuclei in the guinea fowl (Numida meleagris).

Authors:  B A Bonke; D Bonke; H Scheich
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1979-08-03       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  Response of cochlear-nucleus neurons to synthetic speech.

Authors:  T J Moore; J L Cashin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Response patterns of single auditory neurons of the cat to species-specific vocalization.

Authors:  T Watanabe; Y Katsuki
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  1974-04

5.  Multiple coding of species-specific vocalizations in the auditory cortex of squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  J D Newman; Z Wollberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1973-05-17       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  How does a mynah bird imitate human speech?

Authors:  D H Klatt; R A Stefanski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency analysis of Dutch vowels from 50 male speakers.

Authors:  L C Pols; H R Tromp; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory responses of units in the ovoid nucleus and cerebrum (field L) of the ring dove.

Authors:  M Biederman-Thorson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1970-12-01       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Functional organization of some auditory nuclei in the guinea fowl demonstrated by the 2-deoxyglucose technique.

Authors:  H Scheich; B A Bonke; D Bonke; G Langner
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  Response characteristics of cochlear nucleus neurons to vowel sounds.

Authors:  A L Rupert; D M Caspary; G Moushegian
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1977 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  16 in total

1.  Gradual emergence of song selectivity in sensorimotor structures of the male zebra finch song system.

Authors:  P Janata; D Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural response to bird's own song and tutor song in the zebra finch field L and caudal mesopallium.

Authors:  N Amin; J A Grace; F E Theunissen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Neuron-specific stimulus masking reveals interference in spike timing at the cortical level.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox; Ben P Perrone; Kamal Sen; Cyrus P Billimoria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-01

4.  Role of the zebra finch auditory thalamus in generating complex representations for natural sounds.

Authors:  Noopur Amin; Patrick Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Hierarchical organization of auditory temporal context sensitivity.

Authors:  M S Lewicki; B J Arthur
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Temporal and spectral sensitivity of complex auditory neurons in the nucleus HVc of male zebra finches.

Authors:  F E Theunissen; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Orderly cortical representation of vowels based on formant interaction.

Authors:  F W Ohl; H Scheich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Feature extraction and tonotopic organization in the avian auditory forebrain.

Authors:  C M Müller; H J Leppelsack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Physiology of higher nervous activity: prospects of its development.

Authors:  E N Sokolov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb

10.  Time-critical integration of formants for perception of communication calls in mice.

Authors:  Diana B Geissler; Günter Ehret
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.