Literature DB >> 8668519

Evaluation of mental representation for same and mixed compatibility assignments.

L A Dornier1, T Gilmour Reeve.   

Abstract

In most studies of stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility, assignments within a set are either compatible or incompatible for all S-R combinations. The present study provided an extension of previous research by examining the situations with same or mixed S-R assignments for pairs of subsets from a four-choice spatial precuing task. Assignments of stimuli to responses for the subsets could be same (both subsets assigned compatibility or both assigned incompatibility) or mixed (one subset assigned compatibility and one subset assigned incompatibility). A precue stimulus provided advanced information about which subset, and thus which assignment, would be required for responding on each trial. Experiment 1 had four visual stimuli assigned to four response locations, whereas Experiment 2 had the four visual stimuli assigned to only two response locations. For both experiments, the analyses revealed similar patterns of reaction times, with reaction times slower in the mixed condition than in the same condition. Moreover, the reaction times for the compatible assignments in the mixed sets were slowed more than the incompatible ones in those sets. The nonprecued subset influenced the S-R translation processes, indicating that the nonprecued subset was part of the mental representation upon which subjects were making decisions.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8668519     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  16 in total

1.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; C M SEEGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-09

2.  Response programming, as assessed by reaction time, does not establish commands for particular muscles.

Authors:  S T Klapp
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 3.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

5.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation.

Authors:  J R Simon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-07

6.  Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects?

Authors:  E Ladavas; M Moscovitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Response selection in spatial choice reaction: further evidence against associative models.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12

9.  Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions.

Authors:  D Goodman; J A Kelso
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12

10.  Responding with hand and foot: the right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present.

Authors:  R Nicoletti; C Umiltà
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.