Literature DB >> 6235309

What is rotated in mental rotation?

A Koriat, J Norman.   

Abstract

Two hypotheses regarding mental rotation were contrasted. If subjects rotate each stimulus image to the upright (the image rotation hypothesis), then response time should depend solely on the extent of angular deviation from the upright. But if subjects rotate their frame of reference to match that of the disoriented stimulus (the frame rotation hypothesis), then response time should vary with the angular deviation between the current stimulus and the preceding stimulus. In four experiments, one involving normal and reflected letters (Experiment 1) and the other three involving lexical decisions on Hebrew letter strings (Experiments 2, 3A, and 3B), much stronger evidence for the image rotation hypothesis was found, though weak but systematic effects of frame rotation were also obtained. Increased likelihood that the same orientation would be repeated (Experiment 4) did not yield any stronger frame rotation effects. Also there was no indication of consistent individual differences in the preference for the frame rotation strategy (Experiment 3B). Additional findings pertinent to the application of the mental rotation paradigm to word recognition were discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6235309     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.10.3.421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  15 in total

1.  Understanding neural system dynamics through task modulation and measurement of functional MRI amplitude, latency, and width.

Authors:  P S F Bellgowan; Z S Saad; P A Bandettini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Image rotation of misoriented letter strings: effects of orientation cuing and repetition.

Authors:  K Jordan; L A Huntsman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

3.  On the process of recognizing inverted words: does it rely only on orientation-invariant cues?

Authors:  David Navon; Ofra Raveh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

4.  Attending to a misoriented word causes the eyeball to rotate in the head.

Authors:  Harold Pashler; V S Ramachandran; Mark W Becker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

5.  Learning to read vertical text in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Ahalya Subramanian; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Harrison Wagoner; Deyue Yu
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Not all perceptual difficulties lower memory predictions: Testing the perceptual fluency hypothesis with rotated and inverted object images.

Authors:  Miri Besken; Elif Cemre Solmaz; Meltem Karaca; Nilsu Atılgan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

7.  Morpheme Transposition of Two-Character Chinese Words in Vertical Visual Fields.

Authors:  Hong-Wen Cao; Cheng Chen; Hong-Mei Yan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-01-04

8.  The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections.

Authors:  P A McMullen; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-01

9.  Sensory factors limiting horizontal and vertical visual span for letter recognition.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Wagoner; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Motion in the mind's eye: comparing mental and visual rotation.

Authors:  Amy L Shelton; Holly A Pippitt
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.