Literature DB >> 30790210

Not all perceptual difficulties lower memory predictions: Testing the perceptual fluency hypothesis with rotated and inverted object images.

Miri Besken1, Elif Cemre Solmaz2, Meltem Karaca2,3, Nilsu Atılgan2,4.   

Abstract

Studies typically show that perceptual difficulties at the time of encoding lower memory predictions. One potential exception to this is the inverted-word manipulation, in which participants produce equivalent memory predictions for upright and inverted words, despite higher free-recall performance for the inverted words (Sungkhasettee, Friedman, & Castel in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 973-978, 2011). In the present set of experiments, we aimed to investigate the contributions of online perceptual difficulties versus a priori beliefs through two disfluency manipulations conceptually similar to the inverted-word manipulation: inversion and canonicity. The inversion manipulation involved presentation of upright and inverted object images, whereas the canonicity manipulation involved presentation of objects to participants from frequent (canonical) or infrequent (noncanonical) viewing perspectives. Memory predictions were made either on an item-by-item basis or aggregately. In all studies, the perceptual identification latencies for inverted and noncanonical items were slower than those for upright and canonical items, respectively. In experiments conducted with item-by-item memory predictions, predictions were not significantly different from each other across encoding conditions. In contrast, in experiments using aggregate memory predictions, fluent items produced higher memory predictions than did disfluent items. These results show that in certain cases, participants may not consider online objective perceptual difficulties. Moreover, item-by-item and aggregate memory predictions produce different patterns, evidence of a dissociation between the two types of predictions. The results are discussed in light of theories that rely on objective perceptual fluency differences across encoding conditions versus theories that rely on participants' a priori beliefs about fluency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Image inversion; Image rotation; Judgments of learning (JOLs); Metamemory; Perceptual fluency

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30790210     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00907-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  37 in total

1.  The source of feelings of familiarity: the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; L D Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; L D Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  A pool of pairs of related objects (POPORO) for investigating visual semantic integration: behavioral and electrophysiological validation.

Authors:  Lyudmyla Y Kovalenko; Maximilien Chaumon; Niko A Busch
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Identity priming consistently affects perceptual fluency but only affects metamemory when primes are obvious.

Authors:  Jonathan A Susser; Andy Jin; Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Memory for objects in canonical and noncanonical viewpoints.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Jennifer Shutter; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

6.  Perceptual fluency, auditory generation, and metamemory: analyzing the perceptual fluency hypothesis in the auditory modality.

Authors:  Miri Besken; Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments.

Authors:  David J Frank; Beatrice G Kuhlmann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The effects of list composition and perceptual fluency on judgments of learning (JOLs).

Authors:  Jonathan A Susser; Neil W Mulligan; Miri Besken
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-10

9.  Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.

Authors:  S Kinoshita
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-09

10.  The combined effects of plane disorientation and foreshortening on picture naming: one manipulation or two?

Authors:  R Lawson; G W Humphreys; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.