Literature DB >> 6232338

Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech.

P C Gordon, D E Meyer.   

Abstract

Some reaction time experiments are reported on the relation between the perception and production of phonetic features in speech. Subjects had to produce spoken consonant-vowel syllables rapidly in response to other consonant-vowel stimulus syllables. The stimulus syllables were presented auditorily in one condition and visually in another. Reaction time was measured as a function of the phonetic features shared by the consonants of the stimulus and response syllables. Responses to auditory stimulus syllables were faster when the response syllables started with consonants that had the same voicing feature as those of the stimulus syllables. A shared place-of-articulation feature did not affect the speed of responses to auditory stimulus syllables, even though the place feature was highly salient. For visual stimulus syllables, performance was independent of whether the consonants of the response syllables had the same voicing, same place of articulation, or no shared features. This pattern of results occurred in cases where the syllables contained stop consonants and where they contained fricatives. It held for natural auditory stimuli as well as artificially synthesized ones. The overall data reveal a close relation between the perception and production of voicing features in speech. It does not appear that such a relation exists between perceiving and producing places of articulation. The experiments are relevant to the motor theory of speech perception and to other models of perceptual-motor interactions.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6232338     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.2.153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Sakai; Katsuya Kitaguchi; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Stimulus-response compatibility in the programming of speech.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; A M Gordon; N A Stillings; M H Feinstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

3.  Cross-modal compatibility effects with visual-spatial and auditory-verbal stimulus and response sets.

Authors:  R W Proctor; A Dutta; P L Kelly; D J Weeks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-01

4.  Perceiving while producing: Modeling the dynamics of phonological planning.

Authors:  Kevin D Roon; Adamantios I Gafos
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Observation of static gestures influences speech production.

Authors:  Michelle Jarick; Jeffery A Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Perceptuo-motor effects of response-distractor compatibility in speech: beyond phonemic identity.

Authors:  Kevin D Roon; Adamantios I Gafos
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

7.  Effects of phonological features on reading-aloud latencies: A cross-linguistic comparison.

Authors:  Anastasia Ulicheva; Kevin D Roon; Zoya Cherkasova; Petroula Mousikou
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.140

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.