Literature DB >> 18493754

Observation of static gestures influences speech production.

Michelle Jarick1, Jeffery A Jones.   

Abstract

Research investigating 'mirror neurons' has demonstrated the presence of an observation-execution matching system in humans. One hypothesized role for this system might be to aid in action understanding by encoding the underlying intentions of the actor. To investigate this hypothesis, we asked participants to observe photographs of an actor making orofacial gestures (implying verbal or non-verbal acts), and to produce syllables that were compatible or incompatible with the gesture they observed. We predicted that if mirror neurons encode the intentions of an actor, then the pictures implying verbal gestures would affect speech production, whereas the non-verbal gestures would not. Our results showed that the observation of compatible verbal gestures facilitated verbal responses, while incompatible verbal gestures caused interference. Although this compatibility effect did not reach statistical significance when the photographs implied a non-verbal act, responses were faster on average when the gesture implied the use of similar articulators as those involved with the production of the target syllable. Altogether, these behavioral findings compliment previous neuroimaging studies indicating that static pictures portraying gestures activate brain regions associated with an observation-execution matching system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18493754     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1416-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Motor activation from visible speech: evidence from stimulus response compatibility.

Authors:  D Kerzel; H Bekkering
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing.

Authors:  Susan Bookheimer
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Explaining Facial Imitation: A Theoretical Model.

Authors:  Andrew N Meltzoff; M Keith Moore
Journal:  Early Dev Parent       Date:  1997-09

4.  Is human imitation based on a mirror-neurone system? Some behavioural evidence.

Authors:  Andreas Wohlschläger; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech.

Authors:  P C Gordon; D E Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

8.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.

Authors:  V Gallese; A Goldman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. 2. Observation compared with imagination.

Authors:  S T Grafton; M A Arbib; L Fadiga; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study.

Authors:  R Hari; N Forss; S Avikainen; E Kirveskari; S Salenius; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of seeing and hearing speech on speech production: a response time study.

Authors:  Michelle Jarick; Jeffery A Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Prediction and imitation in speech.

Authors:  Chiara Gambi; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.