Literature DB >> 24865282

Perceptuo-motor effects of response-distractor compatibility in speech: beyond phonemic identity.

Kevin D Roon1, Adamantios I Gafos.   

Abstract

Previous studies have found faster response times in a production task when a speaker perceives a distractor syllable that is identical to the syllable they are required to produce. No study has found such effects when a response and a distractor are not identical but share parameters below the level of the phoneme. Results from Experiment 1 show some evidence of a response-time effect of response-distractor voicing congruency. Experiment 2 showed a robust effect of articulator congruency: perceiving a distractor that has the same articulatory organ as that implicated in the planned motor response speeds up response times. These results necessitate a more direct and specific formulation of the perception-production link than warranted by previous experimental evidence. Implications for theories of speech production are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24865282     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0666-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Motor activation from visible speech: evidence from stimulus response compatibility.

Authors:  D Kerzel; H Bekkering
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Speech perception.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl; Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 4.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

5.  The link between speech perception and production is phonological and abstract: evidence from the shadowing task.

Authors:  Holger Mitterer; Mirjam Ernestus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-09-20

6.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production.

Authors:  A Roelofs
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1997-09

7.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

8.  Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues.

Authors:  J J Ohala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Neural representations and mechanisms for the performance of simple speech sequences.

Authors:  Jason W Bohland; Daniel Bullock; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in speech.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; Louis Goldstein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production.

Authors:  Audrey Bürki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

2.  Dimension-Based Statistical Learning Affects Both Speech Perception and Production.

Authors:  Matthew Lehet; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-25

3.  Perceiving while producing: Modeling the dynamics of phonological planning.

Authors:  Kevin D Roon; Adamantios I Gafos
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Dimensions of similarity in the mental lexicon.

Authors:  Melinda Fricke; Melissa M Baese-Berk; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Effects of phonological features on reading-aloud latencies: A cross-linguistic comparison.

Authors:  Anastasia Ulicheva; Kevin D Roon; Zoya Cherkasova; Petroula Mousikou
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.140

6.  Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels.

Authors:  Patti Adank; Helen Nuttall; Harold Bekkering; Gwijde Maegherman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Computer simulations of coupled idiosyncrasies in speech perception and speech production with COSMO, a perceptuo-motor Bayesian model of speech communication.

Authors:  Marie-Lou Barnaud; Jean-Luc Schwartz; Pierre Bessière; Julien Diard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.