Literature DB >> 8036092

Cross-modal compatibility effects with visual-spatial and auditory-verbal stimulus and response sets.

R W Proctor1, A Dutta, P L Kelly, D J Weeks.   

Abstract

Within the visual-spatial and auditory-verbal modalities, reaction times to a stimulus have been shown to be faster if salient features of the stimulus and response sets correspond than if they do not. Accounts that attribute such stimulus-response compatibility effects to general translation processes predict that similar effects should occur for cross-modal stimulus and response sets. To test this prediction, three experiments were conducted examining four-choice reactions with (1) visual spatial-location stimuli assigned to speech responses, (2) speech stimuli assigned to keypress responses, and (3) symbolic visual stimuli assigned to speech responses. In all the experiments, responses were faster when correspondence between salient features of the stimulus and response sets was maintained, demonstrating that similar principles of translation operate both within and across modalities.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8036092     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  7 in total

1.  Persistence of stimulus-response compatibility effects with extended practice.

Authors:  A Dutta; R W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Stimulus-response compatibility in the programming of speech.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; A M Gordon; N A Stillings; M H Feinstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

3.  S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances.

Authors:  C F Michaels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Stimulus-response compatability for moving stimuli: perception of affordances or directional coding?

Authors:  R W Proctor; T Van Zandt; C H Lu; D J Weeks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech.

Authors:  P C Gordon; D E Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses.

Authors:  T G Reeve; R W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.332

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  The interplay of cue modality and response latency in brain areas supporting crossmodal motor preparation: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  Zainab Fatima; Anthony Randal McIntosh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.